%PDF-1.3 % 97 0 obj <> endobj xref 97 8 0000000016 00000 n 0000000819 00000 n 0000000918 00000 n 0000001092 00000 n 0000001193 00000 n 0000002345 00000 n 0000002448 00000 n 0000000456 00000 n trailer <]>> startxref 0 %%EOF 104 0 obj<>stream xb```"mf61~!Gbl``RI38IcY;-/ :to`SpL#'z$wd|8aVHfnVTN)\V1kKk%%n@Tធ&s\@%O88::B;-4X#:X28888m`hhhT``Pj``"FA r _%4+8@@[Q͈e#ۡo.G}ֲ)K&00*p endstream endobj 98 0 obj<> endobj 99 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 100 0 obj<> endobj 101 0 obj<>stream BT 72 686.28 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 36 Tf -0.016 Tc -0.032 Tw (The ) Tj 73.92 0 TD 0.0053 Tc 0 Tw (Five-Year) Tj -73.92 -51.48 TD 0.015 Tc -0.063 Tw (Assessment of) Tj 0 -51.36 TD -0.0024 Tc -0.0456 Tw (Higher Education) Tj T* 0.0018 Tc 0 Tw (Restructuring) Tj 0 -85.2 TD /F0 27.96 Tf 0.0236 Tc 0.0035 Tw (July 1999) Tj 0 -103.56 TD /F1 20.04 Tf -0.002 Tc -0.0492 Tw (A joint report of the) Tj 0 -23.04 TD -0.0083 Tc -0.0428 Tw (ӣƵ Commission) Tj T* -0.0082 Tc -0.0429 Tw (on Higher Education) Tj 0 -22.92 TD 0.0063 Tc -0.0574 Tw (and the) Tj 0 -23.04 TD -0.0107 Tc -0.0405 Tw (ӣƵ Presidents' Council) Tj ET 24.48 767.04 0.48 0.48 re f 24.48 767.04 0.48 0.48 re f 24.96 767.04 562.08 0.48 re f 587.04 767.04 0.48 0.48 re f 587.04 767.04 0.48 0.48 re f 24.48 24.96 0.48 742.08 re f 587.04 24.96 0.48 742.08 re f 587.52 24.96 0.48 742.08 re f 24.48 24.48 0.48 0.48 re f 24.48 24.48 0.48 0.48 re f 24.96 24.48 562.08 0.48 re f 24.96 24 562.08 0.48 re f 587.52 24 0.48 0.96 re f 587.04 24 0.96 0.48 re f 587.04 24.48 0.48 0.48 re f 587.04 24.48 0.48 0.48 re f endstream endobj 102 0 obj<> endobj 103 0 obj[/PDF/Text] endobj 1 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 2 0 obj<>stream BT 237.48 708.72 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf -0.0129 Tc 0.0489 Tw (I. INTRODUCTION) Tj ET 237.48 706.92 122.4 0.6 re f BT 72 684.96 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0132 Tc 0 Tw (Background) Tj ET 72 682.44 63.36 1.2 re f BT 72 665.4 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0047 Tc 0.0207 Tw (ӣƵ\222s higher education system is nearing the end of its fifth year under the new) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (governance system created by the Higher Education Restructuring Act. Shortly after taking) Tj T* -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (office in January 1994, Governor Christine Todd Whitman called for a new governance) Tj T* -0.0057 Tc 0.0257 Tw (structure for higher education in ӣƵ, with greater autonomy for colleges and) Tj T* -0.0034 Tc 0.0126 Tw (universities at the heart of her recommendation. To help formulate the requisite statutory) Tj T* -0.0051 Tc 0.0235 Tw (changes, the Governor appointed a 15-member advisory panel drawn from the ranks of higher) Tj T* -0.0068 Tc 0.0395 Tw (education administration, the K-12 community, the Legislature, the private sector, and other) Tj T* -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (organizations concerned with higher education in ӣƵ. After public hearings and) Tj T* -0.0049 Tc 0.0289 Tw (deliberation, the panel made specific recommendations for a tripartite governance structure) Tj T* -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (designed to increase institutional autonomy and accountability and better serve state needs.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0068 Tc 0.0345 Tw (The Legislature concurred with the panel and used its recommendations as the foundation for) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0047 Tc 0.0232 Tw (a new statutory governance structure. The resulting July 1994 restructuring act declares that) Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (eliminating unnecessary state oversight will spur institutional creativity and innovation and) Tj T* -0.0048 Tc 0.0248 Tw (that placing greater decision making and accountability at the institutional level will better) Tj T* -0.0027 Tc 0.012 Tw (enable ӣƵ colleges and universities to fulfill their missions and to serve statewide) Tj T* -0.0058 Tc 0.0298 Tw (goals. It further declares the need for state level coordination as well as cooperation among) Tj T* -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (the institutions to achieve institutional excellence and effectiveness in addressing state needs) Tj T* -0.0038 Tc 0.0138 Tw (and providing an affordable and accessible system of higher education in ӣƵ.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0054 Tc 0.0239 Tw (With the enactment of the restructuring law, the former Board and Department of Higher) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0122 Tw (Education were eliminated. Dissolving these entities reduced the extent of state involvement) Tj T* -0.0068 Tc 0.0325 Tw (in institutional matters and removed a level of bureaucratic review. A new shared governance) Tj T* -0.0046 Tc 0.0264 Tw (structure was established. The tripartite, entrepreneurial governance model consists of the) Tj T* 0.0011 Tc -0.0011 Tw (Commission on Higher Education, the Presidents\222 Council, and the individual institutional) Tj T* -0.0103 Tc 0.0103 Tw (trustee boards.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.0231 Tw (Under the new paradigm, boards of trustees are ultimately responsible for the governance of) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0044 Tc 0.0244 Tw (their institutions. They are specifically charged with responsibility for institutional policy and) Tj T* -0.003 Tc 0.0163 Tw (planning, student tuition and fees, admissions, degree requirements, investment of) Tj T* -0.0015 Tc 0.0107 Tw (institutional funds, legal affairs, and a budget request for state support. The institutional) Tj T* -0.0047 Tc 0.0287 Tw (governing bodies also have authority for academic programs, personnel decisions, and) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (initiatives for improving institutional facilities. To document institutional outcomes, the) Tj T* -0.0032 Tc 0.0152 Tw (public institutions prepare annual accountability reports, for which the Commission approves) Tj T* -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (the reporting format.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0044 Tc 0.0244 Tw (The role of the Commission in the new paradigm includes general systemwide coordination,) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0039 Tc 0.0159 Tw (research, advocacy, planning, and policy development, with advice from the Presidents\222) Tj T* -0.0037 Tc 0.0157 Tw (Council. The Commission recommends higher education initiatives and incentive programs) Tj T* -0.0053 Tc 0.033 Tw (to the Governor and Legislature and submits an annual coordinated budget policy statement to) Tj T* -0.0087 Tc 0.0587 Tw (the Governor and Legislature. It also has authority for institutional licensure, university) Tj T* -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (status, institutional requests to exceed or change their programmatic mission, and new degree) Tj T* -0.0035 Tc 0.0128 Tw (programs referred by the Presidents\222 Council as unduly costly or unduly duplicative. In) Tj T* -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (addition, the Commission works with the Department and State Board of Education, other) Tj T* -0.0042 Tc 0.026 Tw (state agencies, and the federal government; approves higher education capital and equipment) Tj ET endstream endobj 3 0 obj 21321 endobj 4 0 obj 21321 endobj 5 0 obj 0 endobj 6 0 obj 0 endobj 7 0 obj<>stream  POS/2woJVcmapu]j2#7* post%σ3kprep8MT13z3fMONO p   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?ٷұѱʲϸ鳧ձհ³ݳ۴ܰڰհ帿ڲԴDZٳܱɳā荎"<~~ O\_   " & 0 3 : < > D  !!!!"!&!.!^!!"""""""")"+"H"a"e###!%%% %%%%%$%,%4%<%l%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%&<&@&B&`&c&f&k  ~Q^   & 0 2 9 < > D  !!!!"!&!.![!!"""""""")"+"H"`"d### %%% %%%%%$%,%4%<%P%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%&:&@&B&`&c&e&jR  x;.4jy߲ߠޖޢދާ!q_0NA2TSJGDA>70)"ۀܳjSPO20/,1ttfjxlTTVR*,(bcdefghjikmlnoqprsutvwxzy{}|~RSTUVW   XYZ[\]  ^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0F:GIIKLMNQ%% %|'p3]][*XZEi8#3 X8>DX\`#VW]^hWX Z ;d/2ANfk~,Yj2H^19;;=U"'Kjj'G<8a!"%.GWZ\btw !1%2DXcw{"9@Q'ST !.f  &448<EEEMRSccchhijkqry$(4557@FMRTZbcn)/5^_rj R^ktY\=!P %+,/16:HP\bdeeghhnqs}~    &&+,2;KU\\\ev$2:?BFOQ`fh#,:>?`bfx|*8Takst~ :b"K#`A/0up-sawha_`wE.= 4N~"}b h3@9:98743210/.-,+*)('&%$#"!  ,E#F` &`&#HH-,E#F#a &a&#HH-,E#F` a F`&#HH-,E#F#a ` &a a&#HH-,E#F`@a f`&#HH-,E#F#a@` &a@a&#HH-, <<-, E# D# ZQX# D#Y QX# MD#Y &QX# D#Y!!-, EhD ` EFvhE`D-, C#Ce -, C#C -,F#pF>F#pFE: -,EJ#DEI#D-, E%EadPQXED!!Y-,Cc#b#B+-, EC`D-,CCe -, i@a ,b`+ d#da\XaY-,E+G#DGz-,TX CTXJIDDYY-,CXE+G#DGzEi G#D QX+G#DGz!GzYY-,-,KRX!ED#E %ERXD!!YY-,/-, %EI#DEJ#DEe#E %`j #B#hj`a Ry!J@JE TX#!?#YaDRyI@ IE TX#!?#YaD-,C#C -,C#C -, C#C -, C#Ce -,C#Ce -,C#Ce -,KRXED!!Y-, %#I@` c RX#%8#%e8c8!!!!!Y-,Ei C`:-,%# `#-,%# a#-,%-, ` <<-, a <<-,++**-,CC -,>**-,5-,vK#p KE PXaY:/-,!! d#d@b-,!QX d#d b@/+Y`-,!QX d#dUb/+Y`-, d#d@b`#!-,&&&&Eh:-,&&&&Ehe:-,E# E %PX&a&`YD-,F#F`F# F`ab# #KKpE` PXa@Yh:-,3+**-,CXY-,CXY-,KS#KQZX E`D!!Y-,KS#KQZX8!!Y-/'' &&/?10!!%!! @ t7 "@ O P  0   ]q?102#"&546FccFEcc7dFGddGFd= #t@t !rrO@  0@ ]q]9/]??910Cy@*%& &b b  bb b b+++++<<++++73#&#"327673# 76!2EJ\+ya]%Z ekXeOt޽CMD$@FV.$ W WW  !nO@_p@ 0@%]qr]3/<??<10Cy@ &%%&bbbb++++++++]!2#!532654&+2>5&#"3MH{-.09m׉^oe3)-Ǹ]1,Z-)w"-2,KAP@W W @ n@o 0@]q<<<<]?<$]]/*[.+UA)GE@*,WWr @` nr @!`0`0@9/]qrq9/q9/?<54&+5!#"!"$&54&+? $waG[kZ4'X\w,9m]+,έ3&txx]]bW㊋}Ţ?:+_<86uxs   E h LL^om6+<9a9t9hw`}}9}9a>>>o9V9MG]hoK/U]U@?ceyV\E?VT""{e/7s^VbhLb{JrV:I({bUVb/c'Wth,{R+gE>Lpy[?9G?c?eeeeees^hhhhrrE3{bUUUUU{R{R{R{R3BgTK8..dc5ddd&ON+.d413*% wUt^=dTDd Lc)BEd/>9,???'><3j.]hbKV\t9s^9s^VbeeMb'GhGhKrUIUIU{I?{b?{bcUy'Wy'WV\tEh,E\?{R?{RVTLpVTLpfo}dduVVV}VGVzt1 hOOOjpe9s^9s^GhGhGhhbhbhbo{Jk{JKKKDKr/U]V:qTUI?{blTbcUcUy'WV\tEh,?{R?{R?{R?{Rg>$ewcU9}=79Vk0GVTodK]@?wckVTEkd?*hKRbBV{b78VRRb*DUBVZ{bj78V:{M+^Ua-YV5$VR?U*)V7VRUVR)VG)BkdV\KK/U P kA{kkNk9VkGL}Sll{k @ock9Eek 3l 3lE sl\lS kMeVQQ h+0BURRQ?DQ}RUfQVbs^V%>VE\QsQmQT$QQmVQ0h{JQftr5Q{JQ>^RlQggg>F@Z~D"~~~~~~~T0 0 *Uo@@7@@%Ui<D/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTaaaaaD<s;( MK:Q:  0  : := w :  c :q  :  :9:K:: :M:[  :  :Typeface The Monotype Corporation plc. Data The Monotype Corporation plc / Type Solutions Inc. 1990-91 All Rights Reserved.OHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookBoldOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldVersion 2.20OHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldCentury Schoolbook is a registered trademark of The Monotype Corporation plc.fedOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldFettOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldTypeface The Monotype Corporation plc. Data The Monotype Corporation plc / Type Solutions Inc. 1990-91 All Rights Reserved.OHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookBoldOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldVersion 2.20OHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldCentury Schoolbook is a registered trademark of The Monotype Corporation plc.NegritaOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldLihavoituOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldGrasOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldGrassettoOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldVetOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldHalvfetOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldFetOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldNegritoOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldNegritaOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,BoldGrasOHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook,Bold3f      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~spaceexclamquotedbl numbersigndollarpercent ampersand quotesingle parenleft parenrightasteriskpluscommahyphenperiodslashzeroonetwothreefourfivesixseveneightninecolon semicolonlessequalgreaterquestionatABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ bracketleft backslash bracketright asciicircum underscoregraveabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz braceleftbar braceright asciitilde AdieresisAringCcedillaEacuteNtilde Odieresis Udieresisaacuteagrave acircumflex adieresisatildearingccedillaeacuteegrave ecircumflex edieresisiacuteigrave icircumflex idieresisntildeoacuteograve ocircumflex odieresisotildeuacuteugrave ucircumflex udieresisdaggerdegreecentsterlingsectionbullet paragraph germandbls registered copyright trademarkacutedieresisnotequalAEOslashinfinity plusminus lessequal greaterequalyenmu1 partialdiff summationproductpi1integral ordfeminine ordmasculineOhmaeoslash questiondown exclamdown logicalnotradicalflorin approxequal increment guillemotleftguillemotrightellipsisnbspaceAgraveAtildeOtildeOEoeendashemdash quotedblleft quotedblright quoteleft quoterightdividelozenge ydieresis Ydieresisfractioncurrency guilsinglleftguilsinglrightfifl daggerdblperiodcenteredquotesinglbase quotedblbase perthousand Acircumflex EcircumflexAacute EdieresisEgraveIacute Icircumflex IdieresisIgraveOacute OcircumflexappleOgraveUacute UcircumflexUgravedotlessi circumflextildemacronbreve dotaccentringcedilla hungarumlautogonekcaronLslashlslashScaronscaronZcaronzcaron brokenbarEthethYacuteyacuteThornthornminusmultiply onesuperior twosuperior threesuperioronehalf onequarter threequartersfrancGbrevegbreveIdotScedillascedillaCacutecacuteCcaronccarondmacron overscoremiddot foursuperiorAbreveabreveAogonekaogonekDcarondcaronDslashEogonekeogonekEcaronecaronIJijLacutelacuteLcaronlcaronLdotldotNacutenacuteNcaronncaron napostrophe Odblacute odblacuteRacuteracuteRcaronrcaronSacutesacuteTcedillatcedillaTcarontcaronUringuring Udblacute udblacuteZacutezacuteZdotzdotnoGammanoThetanoPhinoalphanodelta noepsilonnosigmanotaunophi underscoredblminutesecond exclamdbl nsuperiorpeseta afii61248 afii61289 arrowleftarrowup arrowright arrowdown arrowboth arrowupdn arrowupdnbse orthogonal intersection equivalenceH22073H18543H18551H18533 openbullet commaaccentAmacronamacron Ccircumflex ccircumflexCdotcdotEmacronemacronEbreveebreveEdotedot Gcircumflex gcircumflexGdotgdotGcedillagcedilla Hcircumflex hcircumflexHbarhbarItildeitildeImacronimacronIbreveibreveIogonekiogonek Jcircumflex jcircumflexKcedillakcedilla kgreenlandicLcedillalcedillaNcedillancedillaEngengOmacronomacronObreveobreveRcedillarcedilla Scircumflex scircumflexTbartbarUtildeutildeUmacronumacronUbreveubreveUogonekuogonek Wcircumflex wcircumflex Ycircumflex ycircumflexlongs Aringacute aringacuteAEacuteaeacute Oslashacute oslashacutetonos dieresistonos Alphatonos anoteleia EpsilontonosEtatonos Iotatonos Omicrontonos Upsilontonos OmegatonosiotadieresistonosAlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMuNuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega IotadieresisUpsilondieresis alphatonos epsilontonosetatonos iotatonosupsilondieresistonosalphabetagammadeltaepsilonzetaetathetaiotakappalambdamunuxiomicronrhosigma1sigmatauupsilonphichipsiomega iotadieresisupsilondieresis omicrontonos upsilontonos omegatonos afii10023 afii10051 afii10052 afii10053 afii10054 afii10055 afii10056 afii10057 afii10058 afii10059 afii10060 afii10061 afii10062 afii10145 afii10017 afii10018 afii10019 afii10020 afii10021 afii10022 afii10024 afii10025 afii10026 afii10027 afii10028 afii10029 afii10030 afii10031 afii10032 afii10033 afii10034 afii10035 afii10036 afii10037 afii10038 afii10039 afii10040 afii10041 afii10042 afii10043 afii10044 afii10045 afii10046 afii10047 afii10048 afii10049 afii10065 afii10066 afii10067 afii10068 afii10069 afii10070 afii10072 afii10073 afii10074 afii10075 afii10076 afii10077 afii10078 afii10079 afii10080 afii10081 afii10082 afii10083 afii10084 afii10085 afii10086 afii10087 afii10088 afii10089 afii10090 afii10091 afii10092 afii10093 afii10094 afii10095 afii10096 afii10097 afii10071 afii10099 afii10100 afii10101 afii10102 afii10103 afii10104 afii10105 afii10106 afii10107 afii10108 afii10109 afii10110 afii10193 afii10050 afii10098WgravewgraveWacutewacute Wdieresis wdieresisYgraveygrave afii00208 quotereversed radicalex afii08941 afii61352 estimated oneeighth threeeighths fiveeighths seveneighthshouse revlogicalnot integraltp integralbtSF100000SF110000SF010000SF030000SF020000SF040000SF080000SF090000SF060000SF070000SF050000SF430000SF240000SF510000SF520000SF390000SF220000SF210000SF250000SF500000SF490000SF380000SF280000SF270000SF260000SF360000SF370000SF420000SF190000SF200000SF230000SF470000SF480000SF410000SF450000SF460000SF400000SF540000SF530000SF440000upblockdnblockblocklfblockrtblockltshadeshadedkshade filledbox filledrecttriaguptriagrttriagdntriaglfcircle invbullet invcircle smileface invsmilefacesunfemalemalespadeclubheartdiamond musicalnotemusicalnotedblundercommaaccent fivesuperior sevensuperior eightsuperior @{[2ia2[2h[2jdn2/A  _ o   CCA WWWUH;^^WWf@fn@@ptt`pм?Oo?OoOO//??__OOiaPj`jpjjjaa`apaP`pP`p@P`pPn`npnnn 0@WFF@H H2 H2 ߲H2 ۲H2 ԲH2 ӲH2 ҲH2 ѲH2 βH2 ̲H2 ȲH2 H2 jH2 iH2 hH2 gH2 dH2 cH2 ^H2 \H2 WH2 VH2 UH2 TH2 SH2 QH2  H2  H2 H2 H2 H2 @WH2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 nH2 jH2 iH2 fH2 aH2 ܲH2 ڲH2 ײH2 ֲH2 ˲H2 ƲH2 ŲH2 H2 H2 kH2 fH2 aH2 XH2 PH2 H2 @SH2 H2 H2  eb]YV$"   KKSBKcKb S# QZ#BKKTB8+KR7+K P[XYTXCX6YY+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++KPyu++++KSyu++++PFKa`+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++EiSBKPXBYC\XBY CX`!YBp>CX;!~ +Y #B #BCX-A-A +Y#B#BCX~;! +Y#B#Bttststststtsst+sstssstststtt+++++++sst++s++++s++++sEh@Eh@` #DEhAEh@`"#D endstream endobj 8 0 obj<> endobj 9 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 10 0 obj<>stream BT 477 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj -426.96 659.16 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0033 Tc 0.0142 Tw (projects funded through state bonds; administers several state grant programs; and holds) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (regulatory authority in statutorily designated areas.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0039 Tc 0.0139 Tw (The Presidents\222 Council is responsible for new program review; formation of regional and) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0149 Tw (cooperative programs among institutions, including policies for transfer and articulation; and) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0159 Tw (recommendations to the Governor, Legislature, and Commission on higher education policy) Tj T* -0.0033 Tc 0.0133 Tw (issues. It also makes recommendations regarding funding for higher education and student) Tj T* -0.0033 Tc 0.0125 Tw (assistance programs. The Council has an advisory role on programmatic mission changes and) Tj T* -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (new degree proposals that exceed an institution\222s mission or are unduly duplicative or) Tj T* 0 Tc -0 Tw (expensive and, upon referral by the Commission, provides recommendations on institutional) Tj T* -0.0021 Tc 0.0114 Tw (licensure and relicensure. The Council also assists and advises the Commission on statewide) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0124 Tw (planning and policy initiatives. The Council was originally comprised of the presidents of the) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (45 public and independent ӣƵ colleges and universities receiving direct state aid;) Tj T* -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (1996 amendments expanded the membership to include four representatives of the 11) Tj T* -0.0034 Tc 0.0126 Tw (proprietary and religious institutions. An Executive Board, also created by the act, is) Tj T* -0.0033 Tc 0.0033 Tw (authorized to carry out much of the Council\222s work.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0078 Tc 0.0421 Tw (The restructuring act also created the Office of Student Assistance as a separate entity to) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0149 Tw (administer the student assistance programs established under the Student Assistance Board) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0.0336 Tw (and the Higher Education Assistance Authority, with policy advice from the Commission in) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0.0116 Tw (several areas. A new law enacted in March 1999 consolidates these entities into the Higher) Tj T* -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (Education Student Assistance Authority, which will include one Commission representative) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0114 Tw (among its members; the chair of the merged student aid policy board will serve as a member) Tj T* 0.006 Tc -0.006 Tw (of the Commission.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0037 Tc 0.0037 Tw (Restructuring Assessment) Tj ET 72 384.84 133.44 1.2 re f BT 72 367.8 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0042 Tc 0.0142 Tw (The restructuring act requires the Commission and the Presidents\222 Council to conduct a) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0131 Tw (comprehensive assessment of the new structure and submit a report to the Governor and) Tj T* -0.0047 Tc 0.0197 Tw (Legislature on or before July 1, 1999. As was done for the required interim assessment of) Tj T* -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (restructuring \(at the two-year mark\), a Restructuring Assessment Committee was formed) Tj T* -0.0026 Tc 0.0146 Tw (consisting of Commission members, presidents representing the four collegiate sectors, and) Tj T* -0.003 Tc 0.003 Tw (Commission staff.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.0155 Tw (The Committee reviewed and summarized the activities and accomplishments of the five) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0047 Tc 0.0304 Tw (years since the new governance structure was established. In addition, the Committee did a) Tj T* -0.0023 Tc 0.0109 Tw (survey to gather perceptions regarding the new structure. The Eagleton Institute of Politics at) Tj T* -0.0058 Tc 0.0276 Tw (Rutgers University assisted in questionnaire design and development, as well as data) Tj T* -0.0023 Tc 0.0173 Tw (collection. Legislative leadership, Commission members, the Presidents\222 Council,) Tj T* -0.0047 Tc 0.0313 Tw (institutional governing boards, student assistance professionals, faculty governance and union) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 0.0138 Tw (leaders, institutional administrators, and student government leaders were surveyed. While) Tj T* -0.0066 Tc 0.0323 Tw (the survey was not conclusive due to a relatively low response rate and a disproportionate) Tj T* -0.0024 Tc 0.0104 Tw (number of returns from some groups, it did provide some interesting data to assist in the) Tj T* -0.0078 Tc 0.0678 Tw (overall assessment ) Tj 92.64 0 TD /F5 12 Tf -0.0096 Tc 0.0096 Tw (\(See Section IV\).) Tj -92.64 -19.8 TD /F4 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (The Committee\222s assessment also benefited from input provided by over 150 participants in) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (an all-day, invitational conference on restructuring. Governor Whitman delivered the keynote) Tj T* -0.0029 Tc 0.0115 Tw (address, a state and a national panel discussed the implementation of the new structure, and) Tj T* -0.0028 Tc 0.0137 Tw (break-out groups discussed specific areas identified by the survey respondents as needing) Tj T* -0.0033 Tc 0.1233 Tw (improvement ) Tj 67.08 0 TD /F5 12 Tf -0.0163 Tc 0.0163 Tw (\(See Section V\).) Tj ET endstream endobj 11 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 12 0 obj<>stream BT 477 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj -248.28 658.8 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.008 Tc -0.008 Tw (II. THE SYSTEM) Tj -178.68 -20.28 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0059 Tc 0.0359 Tw (The restructuring act specifically requires the five-year assessment to include profiles for each) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0071 Tc 0.0371 Tw (public college and university. These data, most which are available from databases) Tj T* -0.0009 Tc 0.0095 Tw (maintained by the Commission, are the same as the core indicators in the annual institutional) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0.0136 Tw (accountability reports; a special survey collected the data that were not readily available.) Tj T* /F3 12 Tf 0.016 Tc -0.016 Tw (Appendix 4 ) Tj 62.16 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0048 Tc 0.0148 Tw (provides a two-page profile of each of the 31 public colleges and universities.) Tj -62.16 -19.8 TD -0.0066 Tc 0.0366 Tw (In addition, the following aggregate data regarding ӣƵ\222s public and private colleges) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0055 Tc 0.024 Tw (and universities provide a general profile of the system for which the new governance) Tj T* -0.0126 Tc 0.0726 Tw (structure was created.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0053 Tc 0 Tw (Students:) Tj 48.72 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0049 Tc 0.0141 Tw ( In fall 1998, ӣƵ colleges and universities enrolled a total of 326,291) Tj -48.72 -13.8 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (students, 183,337 full-time and 142,954 part-time. Undergraduates were 85% of the total, and) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (ӣƵ residents accounted for 92% of the undergraduates.) Tj 130.08 -24.24 TD /F3 9.96 Tf 0.0243 Tc 0.0057 Tw (PROFILE OF ALL STUDENTS, FALL 1998) Tj 22.2 -20.04 TD /F5 11.52 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (Full-Time) Tj 62.52 0 TD 0.0046 Tc (Part-Time) Tj 70.44 0 TD 0.006 Tc (Total) Tj 47.52 0 TD -0.0033 Tc 0.0033 Tw (% N.J. Res.) Tj ET 131.16 504.84 84.6 1.44 re f 215.76 504.72 0.72 0.24 re f 215.76 504.84 1.44 1.44 re f 217.2 504.84 61.44 1.44 re f 278.64 504.84 1.44 1.44 re f 280.08 504.84 62.4 1.44 re f 342.48 504.84 1.44 1.44 re f 343.92 504.84 52.56 1.44 re f 396.48 504.84 1.44 1.44 re f 397.92 504.84 68.4 1.44 re f 215.76 484.92 0.72 19.8 re f BT 136.56 473.76 TD /F4 11.52 Tf -0.004 Tc 0 Tw (Undergraduate) Tj 92.04 0 TD 0 Tc (166,508) Tj 63.24 0 TD (111,155) Tj 58.92 0 TD (277,663) Tj 65.76 0 TD 0.0008 Tc (92.2%) Tj ET 131.16 484.2 84.6 0.72 re f 215.76 484.2 0.72 0.72 re f 216.48 484.2 62.16 0.72 re f 278.64 484.2 0.72 0.72 re f 279.36 484.2 63.12 0.72 re f 342.48 484.2 0.72 0.72 re f 343.2 484.2 53.28 0.72 re f 396.48 484.2 0.72 0.72 re f 397.2 484.2 69.12 0.72 re f 215.76 464.28 0.72 19.92 re f BT 136.56 453.84 TD 0.0024 Tc (Graduate) Tj 92.04 0 TD 0 Tc ( 16,829) Tj 63.24 0 TD ( 31,799) Tj 58.92 0 TD ( 48,628) Tj ET 215.76 444.6 0.72 19.8 re f BT 136.56 434.04 TD 0.0083 Tc (Total) Tj 92.04 0 TD 0 Tc (183,337) Tj 63.24 0 TD (142,954) Tj 58.92 0 TD (326,291) Tj ET 131.16 423.24 84.6 1.44 re f 215.76 424.68 0.72 19.8 re f 215.76 423.24 1.44 1.44 re f 217.2 423.24 61.44 1.44 re f 278.64 423.24 1.44 1.44 re f 280.08 423.24 62.4 1.44 re f 342.48 423.24 1.44 1.44 re f 343.92 423.24 52.56 1.44 re f 396.48 423.24 1.44 1.44 re f 397.92 423.24 68.4 1.44 re f BT 213.96 408 TD /F3 9.96 Tf 0.01 Tc 0.02 Tw (TOTAL ) Tj 37.44 0 TD 0.0261 Tc 0.0039 Tw (ENROLLMENT BY SECTOR) Tj -88.2 -20.28 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.002 Tc -0.002 Tw (Public universities) Tj 215.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (61,725) Tj -215.28 -15.24 TD -0.0094 Tc 0.0094 Tw (State colleges and universities) Tj 215.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (77,672) Tj -215.28 -15.24 TD -0.0254 Tc 0.0254 Tw (Community colleges) Tj 209.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (121,114) Tj ET q 161.64 339.12 200.88 13.68 re W n BT 163.2 342 TD -0.0225 Tc 0.0225 Tw (Four-year independent colleges/universities) Tj ET Q BT 378.48 342 TD (55,921) Tj -215.28 -15.24 TD 0.0057 Tc -0.0057 Tw (Religious institutions) Tj 221.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (3,602) Tj -221.28 -15.24 TD -0.013 Tc 0.013 Tw (Proprietary institutions) Tj 221.28 0 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (6,257) Tj -221.28 -15.24 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0048 Tc (Total) Tj 209.28 0 TD 0 Tc (326,291) Tj ET 0.12 w 1 J 1 j 0 0 0 RG 1 1 1 rg 111.72 149.28 363.72 134.16 re b 0.96 w 0.7529 0.7529 0.7529 rg 231.96 272.4 m 234.96 272.4 l 236.88 272.16 l 237.84 272.16 l 240.72 271.8 l 241.68 271.56 l 242.64 271.44 l 248.4 270 l 249.24 269.64 l 250.2 269.4 l 251.16 269.04 l 252 268.68 l 253.92 267.96 l 255.6 267.24 l 256.56 266.76 l 257.4 266.28 l 258.24 265.92 l 259.08 265.44 l 260.04 264.96 l 260.88 264.48 l 261.6 263.88 l 262.44 263.4 l 263.28 262.8 l 264.12 262.32 l 264.84 261.72 l 265.68 261.12 l 266.4 260.52 l 267.24 259.92 l 268.68 258.72 l 269.4 258 l 270.12 257.4 l 270.84 256.68 l 271.56 256.08 l 272.28 255.36 l 272.88 254.64 l 273.6 253.92 l 274.2 253.2 l 274.92 252.48 l 275.52 251.64 l 276.72 250.2 l 277.32 249.36 l 277.8 248.52 l 278.4 247.8 l 278.88 246.96 l 279.48 246.12 l 281.88 241.92 l 282.36 240.96 l 282.72 240.12 l 283.08 239.16 l 283.56 238.32 l 283.92 237.48 l 231.96 216.48 l 231.96 272.4 l b* 0 0 0 rg 283.92 237.48 m 284.64 235.56 l 284.88 234.72 l 285.24 233.76 l 285.48 232.8 l 285.84 231.84 l 286.08 230.88 l 286.32 230.04 l 286.8 228.12 l 286.92 227.16 l 287.16 226.2 l 287.64 222.36 l 287.76 221.28 l 287.88 220.32 l 287.88 218.4 l 288 217.44 l 288 215.52 l 287.88 214.44 l 287.88 212.52 l 287.16 206.76 l 286.92 205.8 l 286.8 204.84 l 285.84 201 l 285.48 200.04 l 285.24 199.2 l 284.88 198.24 l 284.64 197.28 l 284.28 196.44 l 283.56 194.52 l 283.08 193.68 l 282.72 192.84 l 282.36 191.88 l 280.92 189.36 l 280.44 188.4 l 279.96 187.56 l 279.48 186.84 l 278.88 186 l 278.4 185.16 l 277.8 184.32 l 277.32 183.6 l 276.72 182.76 l 276.12 182.04 l 275.52 181.2 l 274.92 180.48 l 274.2 179.76 l 273.6 179.04 l 272.88 178.32 l 272.28 177.6 l 270.84 176.16 l 270.12 175.56 l 269.4 174.84 l 268.68 174.24 l 267.96 173.52 l 267.24 172.92 l 266.4 172.32 l 265.68 171.72 l 264.84 171.12 l 264.12 170.64 l 263.28 170.04 l 262.44 169.56 l 261.6 168.96 l 260.88 168.48 l 260.04 168 l 259.08 167.52 l 256.56 166.08 l 231.96 216.48 l 283.92 237.48 l b* 1 1 1 rg 256.56 166.08 m 255.6 165.72 l 254.76 165.36 l 253.92 164.88 l 252 164.16 l 251.16 163.8 l 250.2 163.56 l 249.24 163.2 l 248.4 162.96 l 247.44 162.6 l 243.6 161.64 l 242.64 161.52 l 241.68 161.28 l 235.92 160.56 l 234 160.56 l 232.92 160.44 l 231 160.44 l 230.04 160.56 l 228.12 160.56 l 227.16 160.68 l 226.08 160.8 l 222.24 161.28 l 221.28 161.52 l 220.32 161.64 l 218.4 162.12 l 217.56 162.36 l 216.6 162.6 l 215.64 162.96 l 214.68 163.2 l 213.72 163.56 l 212.88 163.8 l 210.96 164.52 l 210.12 164.88 l 209.28 165.36 l 208.32 165.72 l 207.48 166.08 l 206.52 166.56 l 202.32 168.96 l 201.48 169.56 l 200.64 170.04 l 199.92 170.64 l 199.08 171.12 l 198.24 171.72 l 196.8 172.92 l 195.96 173.52 l 195.24 174.24 l 194.52 174.84 l 193.8 175.56 l 193.08 176.16 l 192.36 176.88 l 191.76 177.6 l 191.04 178.32 l 190.44 179.04 l 189.72 179.76 l 188.52 181.2 l 187.92 182.04 l 187.32 182.76 l 186.72 183.6 l 186.12 184.32 l 185.64 185.16 l 185.04 186 l 184.56 186.84 l 183.96 187.56 l 183.48 188.4 l 183 189.36 l 182.52 190.2 l 182.16 191.04 l 181.68 191.88 l 181.2 192.84 l 180.48 194.52 l 179.76 196.44 l 179.4 197.28 l 179.04 198.24 l 178.8 199.2 l 178.44 200.04 l 177 205.8 l 176.88 206.76 l 176.64 207.72 l 176.28 210.6 l 176.28 211.56 l 176.04 213.48 l 176.04 219.36 l 176.28 221.28 l 176.28 222.36 l 176.64 225.24 l 176.88 226.2 l 177 227.16 l 177.72 230.04 l 177.96 230.88 l 178.44 232.8 l 231.96 216.48 l 256.56 166.08 l b* 0.502 0.502 0.502 rg 178.44 232.8 m 178.8 233.76 l 179.04 234.72 l 179.4 235.56 l 180.12 237.48 l 180.84 239.16 l 181.2 240.12 l 181.68 240.96 l 182.16 241.92 l 182.52 242.76 l 183.96 245.28 l 184.56 246.12 l 185.04 246.96 l 185.64 247.8 l 186.12 248.52 l 187.32 250.2 l 188.52 251.64 l 189.12 252.48 l 189.72 253.2 l 190.44 253.92 l 191.04 254.64 l 191.76 255.36 l 192.36 256.08 l 193.08 256.68 l 193.8 257.4 l 194.52 258 l 195.24 258.72 l 195.96 259.32 l 196.8 259.92 l 198.24 261.12 l 199.92 262.32 l 200.64 262.8 l 201.48 263.4 l 202.32 263.88 l 203.16 264.48 l 205.68 265.92 l 206.52 266.28 l 207.48 266.76 l 208.32 267.24 l 209.28 267.6 l 210.96 268.32 l 212.88 269.04 l 213.72 269.4 l 214.68 269.64 l 215.64 270 l 217.56 270.48 l 218.4 270.72 l 221.28 271.44 l 231.96 216.48 l 178.44 232.8 l b* 0.1216 0.1216 0.1216 rg 221.28 271.44 m 222.24 271.56 l 223.2 271.8 l 225.12 272.04 l 231.96 216.48 l 221.28 271.44 l f* 221.28 271.44 m 222.24 271.56 l 223.2 271.8 l 225.12 272.04 l 231.96 216.48 l 221.28 271.44 l S 0.749 0.749 0.749 rg 225.12 272.04 m 226.08 272.16 l 227.16 272.16 l 229.08 272.4 l 231.96 272.4 l 231.96 216.48 l 225.12 272.04 l f* 225.12 272.04 m 226.08 272.16 l 227.16 272.16 l 229.08 272.4 l 231.96 272.4 l 231.96 216.48 l 225.12 272.04 l S 0.12 w 1 1 1 rg 348.36 151.56 122.16 131.88 re b 0.96 w 0.7529 0.7529 0.7529 rg 351.24 274.68 4.92 4.92 re b BT 358.08 274.32 TD 0 0 0 rg /F6 8.04 Tf 0.0033 Tc 0.0416 Tw (Public universities) Tj ET 351.24 252.72 4.92 4.92 re b BT 358.08 252.36 TD -0 Tc 0.045 Tw (State colleges and universities) Tj ET 1 1 1 rg 351.24 230.76 4.92 4.92 re b BT 358.08 230.4 TD 0 0 0 rg 0.0105 Tc 0.0343 Tw (Community colleges) Tj ET 0.502 0.502 0.502 rg 351.24 208.8 4.92 4.92 re b BT 358.08 208.44 TD 0 0 0 rg -0.0249 Tc 0.0698 Tw (Four-year independent) Tj 0 -9.36 TD 0.0031 Tc 0 Tw (colleges/universities) Tj ET 0.1216 0.1216 0.1216 rg 351.24 186.96 4.8 4.8 re f 351.24 186.84 4.92 4.92 re S BT 358.08 186.48 TD 0.0039 0 0 rg 0.0056 Tc 0.0392 Tw (Religious institutions) Tj ET 0.749 0.749 0.749 rg 351.24 165 4.8 4.8 re f 351.24 164.88 4.92 4.92 re S BT 358.08 164.52 TD 0.0039 0 0 rg -0 Tc 0.0456 Tw (Proprietary institutions) Tj ET 0.12 w 111.72 149.28 363.72 134.16 re S endstream endobj 13 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 14 0 obj<>stream BT 477 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (4) Tj -426.96 659.16 TD /F3 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (Student Assistance: ) Tj 103.32 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0032 Tc 0.0141 Tw (ӣƵ ranks second among all states in the amount of need-based) Tj -103.32 -13.8 TD -0.005 Tc 0.025 Tw (student aid provided per full-time undergraduate student. In FY 1998, 57,313 undergraduate) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0047 Tc 0.0265 Tw (students received Tuition Aid Grants, of whom 13,472 also qualified for Educational) Tj T* -0.0038 Tc 0.0238 Tw (Opportunity Fund grants. The state\222s four merit-based scholarships provided aid to 10,858) Tj T* 0.0027 Tc 0 Tw (students.) Tj 30.12 -30.24 TD /F3 9.96 Tf 0.0246 Tc 0.0054 Tw (STATE STUDENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS - UNDERGRADUATE PARTICIPATION) Tj 178.68 -11.52 TD 0.0472 Tc -0.0172 Tw (FY 1998) Tj 11.04 -18.72 TD /F5 9.96 Tf 0.0203 Tc 0.0097 Tw (Number of Students) Tj 119.88 0 TD 0.019 Tc 0.011 Tw (Total Value of Awards) Tj ET 73.92 602.76 198.12 1.44 re f 272.04 602.64 0.72 0.24 re f 272.04 602.76 1.44 1.44 re f 273.48 602.76 116.76 1.44 re f 390.24 602.76 1.44 1.44 re f 391.68 602.76 131.88 1.44 re f 272.04 585.48 0.72 17.16 re f BT 79.32 575.64 TD /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0174 Tc 0 Tw (TAG) Tj 238.2 0 TD 0.035 Tc (57,608) Tj 111.84 0 TD 0.025 Tc ($133,216,450) Tj ET 73.92 584.76 198.12 0.72 re f 272.04 584.76 0.72 0.72 re f 272.76 584.76 117.48 0.72 re f 390.24 584.76 0.72 0.72 re f 390.96 584.76 132.6 0.72 re f 272.04 567.48 0.72 17.28 re f BT 79.32 558.36 TD 0.0085 Tc (EOF) Tj 238.2 0 TD 0.035 Tc (13,487) Tj 114.36 0 TD 0.0327 Tc ($12,866,490) Tj ET 272.04 550.2 0.72 17.28 re f BT 79.32 541.2 TD 0.0119 Tc 0.0181 Tw (Garden State Scholars) Tj 240.6 0 TD 0.054 Tc 0 Tw (2,767) Tj 114.48 0 TD 0.03 Tc ($1,327,632) Tj ET 272.04 532.92 0.72 17.28 re f BT 79.32 523.92 TD 0.0114 Tc 0.0186 Tw (Distinguished Scholars) Tj 240.6 0 TD 0.054 Tc 0 Tw (4,472) Tj 114.48 0 TD 0.03 Tc ($4,332,659) Tj ET 272.04 515.76 0.72 17.28 re f BT 79.32 506.64 TD 0.0067 Tc 0.0233 Tw (Urban Scholars) Tj 240.6 0 TD 0.054 Tc 0 Tw (2,429) Tj 114.48 0 TD 0.03 Tc ($2,294,063) Tj ET 272.04 498.48 0.72 17.28 re f BT 79.32 489.36 TD 0.0072 Tc 0.0828 Tw (Outstanding Scholar Recruitment*) Tj 240.6 0 TD 0.054 Tc 0 Tw (1,230) Tj 114.48 0 TD 0.03 Tc ($3,000,000) Tj ET 272.04 481.2 0.72 17.28 re f BT 79.32 472.2 TD 0.0064 Tc 0.1436 Tw (NJCLASS Loans) Tj 240.6 0 TD 0.054 Tc 0 Tw (3,015) Tj 113.16 0 TD 0.033 Tc ($20,879690) Tj ET 272.04 463.92 0.72 17.28 re f BT 79.32 454.68 TD /F3 9.96 Tf 0.0222 Tc (Total) Tj 350.04 0.24 TD /F4 9.96 Tf 0.025 Tc ($168,395,976) Tj ET 73.92 445.44 198.12 1.44 re f 272.04 446.88 0.72 17.16 re f 272.04 445.44 1.44 1.44 re f 273.48 445.44 116.76 1.44 re f 390.24 445.44 1.44 1.44 re f 391.68 445.44 131.88 1.44 re f BT 72 436.32 TD 0.0104 Tc 0.0322 Tw (*This reflects the first cohort of students. A second cohort was added in FY 1999, roughly doubling the number) Tj 0 -11.76 TD 0.007 Tc 0.041 Tw (of students served and the value of awards. It is anticipated that additional cohorts will be added in future years.) Tj 0 -23.16 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0013 Tc -0.0013 Tw (Undergraduate Student Profile) Tj 159.36 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0054 Tc 0.0174 Tw (: In the fall of 1998, minority students constituted 30 percent) Tj -159.36 -13.8 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.0241 Tw (of all undergraduates enrolled in ӣƵ public and independent institutions. Female) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (students account for 57 percent of undergraduate enrollment. Sixty percent of undergraduate) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0032 Tw (students are enrolled on a full-time basis.) Tj 106.2 -22.08 TD /F3 9.96 Tf 0.023 Tc 0.007 Tw (FALL 1998 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT PROFILE) Tj -106.2 -18.96 TD /F5 9.96 Tf 0.0197 Tc 0 Tw (Race/Ethnicity) Tj 98.76 0 TD 0.0133 Tc (Full-Time) Tj 5.04 -11.52 TD 0.0217 Tc (Female) Tj 47.04 11.52 TD 0.0133 Tc (Full-Time) Tj 9.72 -11.52 TD 0.013 Tc (Male) Tj 42.24 11.52 TD 0.0133 Tc (Full-Time) Tj 9.48 -11.52 TD 0.0169 Tc (Total) Tj 42.12 11.52 TD 0.0105 Tc (Part-Time) Tj 5.52 -11.52 TD 0.0217 Tc (Female) Tj 46.56 11.52 TD 0.0105 Tc (Part-Time) Tj 10.2 -11.52 TD 0.013 Tc (Male) Tj 41.88 11.52 TD 0.0105 Tc (Part-Time) Tj 9.96 -11.52 TD 0.0169 Tc (Total) Tj 55.44 11.52 TD 0.0056 Tc 0.0244 Tw ( All) Tj -9.96 -11.52 TD 0.0257 Tc 0 Tw (Students) Tj ET 68.4 328.08 96 1.44 re f 164.4 327.96 0.72 0.24 re f 164.4 328.08 1.44 1.44 re f 165.84 328.08 51 1.44 re f 216.84 328.08 1.44 1.44 re f 218.28 328.08 50.52 1.44 re f 268.8 328.08 1.44 1.44 re f 270.24 328.08 50.64 1.44 re f 320.88 328.08 1.44 1.44 re f 322.32 328.08 50.64 1.44 re f 372.96 328.08 1.44 1.44 re f 374.4 328.08 50.64 1.44 re f 425.04 328.08 1.44 1.44 re f 426.48 328.08 50.52 1.44 re f 477 328.08 1.44 1.44 re f 478.44 328.08 50.64 1.44 re f 164.4 295.08 0.72 32.88 re f BT 72 285.24 TD /F4 9.96 Tf 0.002 Tc 0.148 Tw (African American) Tj 0 -11.52 TD 0.0137 Tc 0 Tw (Non-Hispanic) Tj 105.84 11.52 TD 0.0387 Tc (14.1%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (10.2%) Tj 51.96 0 TD (12.3%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (13.2%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (10.2%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (12.0%) Tj 51.96 0 TD (12.2%) Tj ET 68.4 294.36 96 0.72 re f 164.4 294.36 0.72 0.72 re f 165.12 294.36 51.72 0.72 re f 216.84 294.36 0.72 0.72 re f 217.56 294.36 51.24 0.72 re f 268.8 294.36 0.72 0.72 re f 269.52 294.36 51.36 0.72 re f 320.88 294.36 0.72 0.72 re f 321.6 294.36 51.36 0.72 re f 372.96 294.36 0.72 0.72 re f 373.68 294.36 51.36 0.72 re f 425.04 294.36 0.72 0.72 re f 425.76 294.36 51.24 0.72 re f 477 294.36 0.72 0.72 re f 477.72 294.36 51.36 0.72 re f 164.4 265.32 0.72 29.04 re f BT 72 256.2 TD -0.0153 Tc (Asian) Tj 108.36 0 TD 0.0333 Tc (7.6%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (9.0%) Tj 51.96 0 TD (8.2%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (4.4%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (5.6%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (4.9%) Tj 51.96 0 TD (6.9%) Tj ET 164.4 247.8 0.72 17.52 re f BT 72 238.68 TD -0.001 Tc (Hispanic) Tj 105.84 0 TD 0.0387 Tc (13.2%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (10.5%) Tj 51.96 0 TD (12.0%) Tj 54.6 0 TD 0.0333 Tc (9.5%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (9.6%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (9.5%) Tj 49.44 0 TD 0.0387 Tc (11.0%) Tj ET 164.4 230.28 0.72 17.52 re f BT 72 221.16 TD 0.0107 Tc 0.0193 Tw (White Non-Hispanic) Tj 105.84 0 TD 0.0387 Tc 0 Tw (56.1%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (60.0%) Tj 51.96 0 TD (57.9%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (63.1%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (62.9%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (63.0%) Tj 51.96 0 TD (59.9%) Tj ET 164.4 212.76 0.72 17.52 re f BT 72 203.76 TD 0.0078 Tc 0.0222 Tw (Other + Unknown) Tj 108.36 0 TD 0.0333 Tc 0 Tw (9.0%) Tj 49.56 0 TD 0.0387 Tc (10.4%) Tj 54.48 0 TD 0.0333 Tc (9.6%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (9.8%) Tj 49.56 0 TD 0.0387 Tc (11.8%) Tj 52.08 0 TD (10.6%) Tj 51.96 0 TD (10.0%) Tj ET 164.4 195.24 0.72 17.52 re f BT 72 186 TD /F3 9.96 Tf 0.0234 Tc 0.0066 Tw (Total \(100%\)) Tj 105 0 TD 0.035 Tc 0 Tw (90,674) Tj 52.08 0 TD (75,834) Tj 49.44 0 TD 0.0386 Tc (166,508) Tj 54.6 0 TD 0.035 Tc (66,412) Tj 52.08 0 TD (44,743) Tj 49.56 0 TD 0.0386 Tc (111,155) Tj 51.96 0 TD (277,663) Tj ET 68.4 176.52 96 1.44 re f 164.4 177.96 0.72 17.4 re f 164.4 176.52 1.44 1.44 re f 165.84 176.52 51 1.44 re f 216.84 176.52 1.44 1.44 re f 218.28 176.52 50.52 1.44 re f 268.8 176.52 1.44 1.44 re f 270.24 176.52 50.64 1.44 re f 320.88 176.52 1.44 1.44 re f 322.32 176.52 50.64 1.44 re f 372.96 176.52 1.44 1.44 re f 374.4 176.52 50.64 1.44 re f 425.04 176.52 1.44 1.44 re f 426.48 176.52 50.52 1.44 re f 477 176.52 1.44 1.44 re f 478.44 176.52 50.64 1.44 re f BT 72 134.76 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0225 Tc (Faculty:) Tj 42.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0045 Tc 0.0302 Tw ( In fall 1998, ӣƵ colleges and universities employed a total of 11,332 full-) Tj -42.48 -13.8 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.0237 Tw (time faculty. Females constituted 37 percent of all faculty; minorities constituted 16 percent) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0192 Tw (of the total. Tenured faculty accounted for 62 percent of the total. The institutions also) Tj T* -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (employ adjunct faculty. With a total of 11,348 part-time faculty members in fall 1997, the) Tj T* -0.0041 Tc 0.015 Tw (statewide ratio of full-time to adjunct or part-time faculty was virtually 1:1.) Tj ET endstream endobj 15 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 16 0 obj<>stream BT 477 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (5) Tj -312.72 660.72 TD /F3 9.96 Tf 0.0253 Tc 0.0047 Tw (PROFILE OF FULL-TIME FACULTY, FALL 1997) Tj -114.24 -18.96 TD /F5 9.96 Tf 0.0197 Tc 0 Tw (Race/Ethnicity) Tj 103.44 0 TD 0.013 Tc (Male) Tj -5.04 -11.4 TD 0.0246 Tc (Faculty) Tj 6.72 -11.52 TD -0 Tc (with) Tj -5.52 -11.52 TD 0.0172 Tc (Tenure) Tj 56.64 34.44 TD 0.013 Tc (Male) Tj -5.04 -11.4 TD 0.0246 Tc (Faculty) Tj 0.36 -11.52 TD 0.0157 Tc (without) Tj 0.84 -11.52 TD 0.0172 Tc (Tenure) Tj 44.88 34.44 TD 0.0152 Tc 0.0148 Tw (Total Male) Tj 6.72 -11.52 TD 0.0246 Tc 0 Tw (Faculty) Tj 53.28 11.52 TD 0.0217 Tc (Female) Tj -0.36 -11.4 TD 0.0246 Tc (Faculty) Tj 6.72 -11.52 TD -0 Tc (with) Tj -5.52 -11.52 TD 0.0172 Tc (Tenure) Tj 51.96 34.44 TD 0.0217 Tc (Female) Tj -0.36 -11.4 TD 0.0246 Tc (Faculty) Tj 0.36 -11.52 TD 0.0157 Tc (without) Tj 0.84 -11.52 TD 0.0172 Tc (Tenure) Tj 56.52 34.44 TD 0.0169 Tc (Total) Tj -4.44 -11.4 TD 0.0217 Tc (Female) Tj -0.36 -11.64 TD 0.0246 Tc (Faculty) Tj 61.08 23.04 TD 0.0056 Tc 0.0244 Tw ( All) Tj -8.28 -11.52 TD 0.0246 Tc 0 Tw (Faculty) Tj ET 68.4 701.04 90.6 1.44 re f 159 700.92 0.72 0.24 re f 159 701.04 1.44 1.44 re f 160.44 701.04 51.72 1.44 re f 212.16 701.04 1.44 1.44 re f 213.6 701.04 51.36 1.44 re f 264.96 701.04 1.44 1.44 re f 266.4 701.04 51.48 1.44 re f 317.88 701.04 1.44 1.44 re f 319.32 701.04 51.36 1.44 re f 370.68 701.04 1.44 1.44 re f 372.12 701.04 51.48 1.44 re f 423.6 701.04 1.44 1.44 re f 425.04 701.04 51.36 1.44 re f 476.4 701.04 1.44 1.44 re f 477.84 701.04 51.36 1.44 re f 159 645 0.72 55.92 re f BT 72 635.16 TD /F4 9.96 Tf 0.002 Tc 0.148 Tw (African American) Tj 103.32 0 TD 0.0333 Tc 0 Tw (4.4%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (5.2%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (4.7%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (7.7%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (7.5%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (7.6%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (5.8%) Tj ET 68.4 644.28 90.6 0.72 re f 159 644.28 0.72 0.72 re f 159.72 644.28 52.44 0.72 re f 212.16 644.28 0.72 0.72 re f 212.88 644.28 52.08 0.72 re f 264.96 644.28 0.72 0.72 re f 265.68 644.28 52.2 0.72 re f 317.88 644.28 0.72 0.72 re f 318.6 644.28 52.08 0.72 re f 370.68 644.28 0.72 0.72 re f 371.4 644.28 52.2 0.72 re f 423.6 644.28 0.72 0.72 re f 424.32 644.28 52.08 0.72 re f 476.4 644.28 0.72 0.72 re f 477.12 644.28 52.08 0.72 re f 159 627 0.72 17.28 re f BT 72 617.88 TD -0.0153 Tc (Asian) Tj 103.32 0 TD 0.0333 Tc (7.0%) Tj 50.28 0 TD 0.0387 Tc (10.3%) Tj 55.32 0 TD 0.0333 Tc (8.0%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (3.5%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (8.0%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (5.6%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (7.1%) Tj ET 159 609.72 0.72 17.28 re f BT 72 600.6 TD -0.001 Tc (Hispanic) Tj 103.32 0.12 TD 0.0333 Tc (2.4%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (2.9%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (2.6%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (3.4%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (3.4%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (3.4%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (2.9%) Tj ET 159 592.44 0.72 17.28 re f BT 72 583.44 TD 0.0036 Tc (White) Tj 100.8 0 TD 0.0387 Tc (85.1%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (71.2%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (80.5%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (84.8%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (76.2%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (80.7%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (80.6%) Tj ET 159 575.28 0.72 17.28 re f BT 72 566.16 TD 0.0078 Tc 0.0222 Tw (Other + Unknown) Tj 103.32 0 TD 0.0333 Tc 0 Tw (1.1%) Tj 50.28 0 TD 0.0387 Tc (10.4%) Tj 55.32 0 TD 0.0333 Tc (4.2%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (0.6%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (5.0%) Tj 52.92 0 TD (2.7%) Tj 52.8 0 TD (3.6%) Tj ET 159 558 0.72 17.28 re f BT 72 548.64 TD /F3 9.96 Tf 0.0234 Tc 0.0066 Tw (Total \(100%\)) Tj 102.36 0 TD 0.054 Tc 0 Tw (4,788) Tj 52.8 0 TD (2,327) Tj 52.8 0 TD (7,115) Tj 52.92 0 TD (2,220) Tj 52.8 0 TD (1,997) Tj 52.92 0 TD (4,217) Tj 50.4 0 TD 0.035 Tc (11,332) Tj ET 68.4 539.4 90.6 1.44 re f 159 540.84 0.72 17.16 re f 159 539.4 1.44 1.44 re f 160.44 539.4 51.72 1.44 re f 212.16 539.4 1.44 1.44 re f 213.6 539.4 51.36 1.44 re f 264.96 539.4 1.44 1.44 re f 266.4 539.4 51.48 1.44 re f 317.88 539.4 1.44 1.44 re f 319.32 539.4 51.36 1.44 re f 370.68 539.4 1.44 1.44 re f 372.12 539.4 51.48 1.44 re f 423.6 539.4 1.44 1.44 re f 425.04 539.4 51.36 1.44 re f 476.4 539.4 1.44 1.44 re f 477.84 539.4 51.36 1.44 re f BT 72 501.24 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0187 Tc (Programs:) Tj 54.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0 Tc 0.0102 Tw ( ӣƵ colleges and universities currently offer over 2,900 degree programs) Tj -54.48 -13.8 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (in 232 different fields.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0043 Tc 0 Tw (Accreditation:) Tj 73.92 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw ( Forty-six ӣƵ institutions are accredited by the Commission on Higher) Tj -73.92 -13.8 TD -0.0042 Tc 0.0135 Tw (Education of the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools. The other 10) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.0293 Tw (institutions are accredited by appropriate specialized accrediting bodies recognized by the) Tj T* -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (U.S. Department of Education or the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.) Tj ET endstream endobj 17 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 18 0 obj<>stream BT 477 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (6) Tj -281.04 658.92 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (III. SURVEY INFORMATION) Tj -145.92 -25.08 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0065 Tc 0.0342 Tw (In an effort to gauge the perceptions of ӣƵ\222s higher education community, the) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0047 Tc 0.0265 Tw (Restructuring Assessment Committee worked with the Center for Public Interest Polling of) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0.0128 Tw (the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University to develop a questionnaire to survey) Tj T* -0.0029 Tc 0.0121 Tw (views on higher education restructuring in ӣƵ. The questionnaire was sent to 475) Tj T* -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (selected participants, and 145, or 31 percent, responded.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0036 Tc 0.0156 Tw (The community college sector had the largest representation \(40%\) among respondents,) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.016 Tw (followed by the independent colleges/universities, the state colleges/universities, and the) Tj T* -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (public research universities.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.003 Tc 0.013 Tw (Counting the category "other," there are 16 possible organizational affiliations that were listed) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0033 Tc 0.0133 Tw (in the questionnaire. These categories have been collapsed into six broader groups:) Tj T* 0 Tc -0.0138 Tw (Commission members, the financial aid community, the Presidents' Council, other) Tj T* -0.0011 Tc 0.0144 Tw (institutional employees and student leaders, trustees, and "other" \(mostly non-Commission) Tj T* -0.0057 Tc 0.0282 Tw (state officials\). It should be noted that multiple affiliations are possible. The largest group of) Tj T* -0.0028 Tc 0.0137 Tw (respondents \(42%\) is other institutional employees and students. Respondents connected with) Tj T* 0 Tc -0 Tw (student assistance are the second largest, followed by presidents, trustees, non-Commission) Tj T* -0.0038 Tc 0.0038 Tw (state officials, and Commission members, in that order.) Tj 0 -26.28 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.026 Tc 0 Tw (Themes) Tj ET 72 436.08 39.72 1.2 re f BT 72 415.08 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (A detailed analysis of the survey and the annotated questionnaire indicating the percentage) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (response to each item on the questionnaire can be found in ) Tj 284.16 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.016 Tc -0.016 Tw (Appendix 1) Tj 59.16 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (. The Committee) Tj -343.32 -13.8 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.0191 Tw (identified the following general themes from the survey responses.) Tj 0 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0038 Tc 0.0131 Tw (As a general rule, positive views of restructuring outweigh negative views; but many see) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (restructuring as only a partial success. Relatively few consider it to have been harmful.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0012 Tc 0.0145 Tw (There are predominantly positive views of improvement in innovation, institutional) Tj 0 -13.68 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (decision making, institutional accountability, and coordination among institutions. On the) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0073 Tc 0.0373 Tw (other hand, views of improvement in resources are predominantly negative. A plurality) Tj T* -0.0026 Tc 0.0135 Tw (rates collaboration between the Commission and the Presidents' Council as excellent or) Tj T* -0.024 Tc 0 Tw (good.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (The community colleges and the state colleges/universities are more frequently positive) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (than the public research universities and the independent colleges and universities.) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0063 Tc 0.0303 Tw (However, there are several other patterns of differences among the sectors.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (With regard to type of organizational affiliation, all of the groups except people involved) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (in financial aid are frequently positive. Financial aid respondents are the most likely to) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0034 Tc 0.0034 Tw (have no opinion.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (Commission members are positive about most issues. They are negative about) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (improvement in resources and institutional coordination.) Tj -18 -20.88 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (The presidents rate improvement in innovation/creativity and institutional coordination as) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0065 Tc 0.0237 Tw (high. They rate improvement in resources negatively.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (Both Commission members and presidents tend to rate collaboration/communication) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.0202 Tw (between their organizations as good but not excellent.) Tj ET endstream endobj 19 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 20 0 obj<>stream BT 477 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (7) Tj -426.96 658.2 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0034 Tc 0.012 Tw (There is a tendency for those with the most positive or the most negative perceptions) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (about changed or unchanged conditions to be more likely to assign credit or blame to) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0086 Tc 0 Tw (restructuring.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw (Those groups with fewer positive views on a particular question tend to have more) Tj 0 -13.68 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (respondents with no opinion on that question.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0048 Tc 0.0233 Tw (The numbers of respondents with no opinion are surprisingly large across a range of) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw (issues, especially on specific questions regarding whether restructuring was responsible) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.0046 Tw (for a perceived change or lack of change.) Tj -18 -20.88 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0039 Tc 0.0139 Tw (The current \(1998\) restructuring survey, along with the 1996 interim survey, directly and) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.0151 Tw (indirectly document a considerable degree of stability in attitudes toward restructuring) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0044 Tc 0.0164 Tw (since 1994. Rowan University's 1998 report directly reaffirms this stability.) Tj -18 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (General Attitudes and Perceptions) Tj ET 72 527.16 176.88 1.2 re f BT 72 510 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0031 Tc 0.0151 Tw (On the broadest summary question, about equal numbers of respondents\227roughly two-fifths) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0122 Tw (each\227believe that the Higher Education Restructuring Act has been a positive change or that) Tj T* -0.0041 Tc 0.0116 Tw (it has been a mixed change. Only one-tenth perceives a negative change, and even fewer have) Tj T* 0.0048 Tc -0.0048 Tw (no opinion.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (Assessing the degree of improvement in six areas, a majority of respondents see some or a) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (great deal of improvement in innovation and creativity in dealing with higher education) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (issues, as well as similar levels of improvement in institutional decision making,) Tj T* -0.0023 Tc 0.0132 Tw (accountability of institutions and their boards of trustees, and coordination and collaboration) Tj T* -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (among higher education institutions. By contrast, a majority see not much improvement, no) Tj T* -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (improvement, or a decline in resources to support policy recommendations. With regard to) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0149 Tw (fair and equitable systemwide policy development and decision making, no clear majority) Tj T* -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (exists, and a high percentage of respondents have no opinion \(16%\).) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (Regarding collaboration and communication between the Commission and the Presidents') Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0049 Tc 0.019 Tw (Council, 45% of the respondents rate it excellent or good, while 31% rate it only fair or poor.) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (One reason for the lack of overall consensus is that 24% of the respondents have no opinion.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0008 Tc -0.0008 Tw (Perceptions Linked to Restructuring) Tj ET 72 282.24 187.56 1.2 re f BT 72 265.2 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0048 Tc 0.0233 Tw (The survey identifies 13 objectives of the restructuring act, and solicits perceptions of how) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0051 Tc 0.0223 Tw (well they have been achieved. In addition, the questionnaire lists nine responsibilities that are) Tj T* -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (shared by the Commission, the Presidents' Council, and institutional boards of trustees, and) Tj T* -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw (asks respondents to indicate how well they think each entity is fulfilling them. Respondents) Tj T* -0.0049 Tc 0.019 Tw (were also asked to indicate if the ratings they gave were based on the changes in the structure) Tj T* -0.004 Tc 0.004 Tw (of higher education.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0033 Tc 0.0125 Tw (An examination of the responses to these items provides an interesting pattern of assessments,) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0027 Tc 0.0113 Tw (based on the particular respondents\222 perceptions. In order to organize the possible ratings, the) Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (committee devised a matrix with four possible combinations of ratings:) Tj 54 -19.8 TD -0.04 Tc 0 Tw (\(a\)) Tj 13.2 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 0 Tc 1.464 Tw ( ) Tj 4.8 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0031 Tc 0.0181 Tw (positive evaluations \(\223excellent\224 or \223good\224\) attributed to the restructuring;) Tj -18 -13.8 TD -0.024 Tc 0 Tw (\(b\)) Tj 13.92 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 0 Tc 0.744 Tw ( ) Tj 4.08 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.003 Tc 0.018 Tw (negative evaluations \(\223only fair\224 or \223poor\224\) attributed to restructuring;) Tj -18 -13.8 TD -0.04 Tc 0 Tw (\(c\)) Tj 13.2 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 0 Tc 1.464 Tw ( ) Tj 4.8 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0031 Tc 0.0031 Tw (positive evaluations not attributed to restructuring; and) Tj -18 -13.8 TD -0.024 Tc 0 Tw (\(d\)) Tj 13.92 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 0 Tc 0.744 Tw ( ) Tj 4.08 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.003 Tc 0.003 Tw (negative evaluations not attributed to restructuring.) Tj ET endstream endobj 21 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 22 0 obj<>stream BT 477 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (8) Tj -426.96 659.16 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0036 Tc 0.0254 Tw (The responses for the three respective entities \(Commission, Presidents\222 Council, and boards) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0068 Tc 0.0368 Tw (of trustees\) were pooled for each responsibility. The following matrix indicates where the) Tj T* -0.0046 Tc 0.0231 Tw (majority of those who responded rated each of the objectives and responsibilities among the) Tj T* -0.0051 Tc 0.0251 Tw (above four possible combinations. Note that respondents who indicated they had \223no) Tj T* -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (opinion\224 are excluded from the matrix, although they are considered in the rest of the) Tj T* -0.0107 Tc 0.1307 Tw (narrative analysis.) Tj 21.24 -30.96 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0132 Tc 0.0132 Tw (Aspects Rated as ) Tj 78 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0184 Tc 0 Tw (Good/Excellent) Tj -73.44 -12.72 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0131 Tc -0.0269 Tw (And Attributed to Restructuring) Tj 267.72 12.72 TD -0.0132 Tc -0.0268 Tw (Aspects Rated as ) Tj 77.88 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0036 Tc 0 Tw (Fair/Poor) Tj -86.16 -12.72 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0149 Tc -0.0151 Tw ( and Attributed to Restructuring) Tj ET 39.36 619.2 0.48 0.48 re f 39.36 619.2 0.48 0.48 re f 39.84 619.2 256.92 0.48 re f 296.76 619.2 0.48 0.48 re f 297.24 619.2 260.52 0.48 re f 557.76 619.2 0.48 0.48 re f 557.76 619.2 0.48 0.48 re f 39.36 593.88 0.48 25.32 re f 296.76 593.88 0.48 25.32 re f 557.76 593.88 0.48 25.32 re f BT 45 570 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0216 Tc 0.0216 Tw (Institutional governing board decision-making) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0162 Tc 0.0162 Tw (Institutional governing board accountability) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.012 Tc -0.018 Tw (Institutional flexibility in establishing new) Tj 0 -12.72 TD -0.0216 Tc 0.0216 Tw (academic programs) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0187 Tc 0.0187 Tw (Adequacy of new academic program review) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0112 Tc -0.0128 Tw (Final determination on disputes and appeals) Tj -18 -13.32 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0156 Tc 0.0156 Tw (Timeliness in addressing issues) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0124 Tc 0.0124 Tw (Timeliness in making decisions) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0155 Tc 0.0155 Tw (Cooperation among the various higher education) Tj 0 -12.72 TD 0.0032 Tc 0 Tw (entities) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0125 Tc -0.0115 Tw (Availability of information on higher education) Tj 239.4 132.84 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0222 Tc 0.0222 Tw (Statewide coordination of academic programming) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.01 Tc -0.05 Tw (Systemwide coordination of higher education) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0148 Tc 0.0148 Tw (Budget development process) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0193 Tc 0.0193 Tw (Coordinated systemwide advocacy) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.01 Tc -0.05 Tw (Progress toward statewide master planning) Tj ET 39.36 593.4 0.48 0.48 re f 39.84 593.4 256.92 0.48 re f 296.76 593.4 0.48 0.48 re f 297.24 593.4 260.52 0.48 re f 557.76 593.4 0.48 0.48 re f 39.36 409.2 0.48 184.2 re f 296.76 409.2 0.48 184.2 re f 557.76 409.2 0.48 184.2 re f BT 93.24 398.76 TD -0.0132 Tc 0.0132 Tw (Aspects Rated as ) Tj 78 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0184 Tc 0 Tw (Good/Excellent) Tj -80.88 -12.72 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.0061 Tc -0.0061 Tw (and ) Tj 18.72 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf 0.0085 Tc 0 Tw (not) Tj 15.36 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0223 Tc 0.0223 Tw ( Attributed to Restructuring) Tj 241.08 12.72 TD -0.0132 Tc -0.0268 Tw (Aspects Rated as ) Tj 77.88 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0036 Tc 0 Tw (Fair/Poor) Tj -93.84 -12.72 TD /F4 11.04 Tf 0.0061 Tc -0.0061 Tw (and ) Tj 18.72 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf 0.0085 Tc 0 Tw (not) Tj 15.36 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0223 Tc 0.0223 Tw ( Attributed to Restructuring) Tj ET 39.36 408.72 0.48 0.48 re f 39.84 408.72 256.92 0.48 re f 296.76 408.72 0.48 0.48 re f 297.24 408.72 260.52 0.48 re f 557.76 408.72 0.48 0.48 re f 39.36 383.4 0.48 25.32 re f 296.76 383.4 0.48 25.32 re f 557.76 383.4 0.48 25.32 re f BT 45 359.52 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0138 Tc 0.0138 Tw (Student access to higher education) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0155 Tc 0.0155 Tw (Affordability of higher education) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0194 Tc 0.0194 Tw (Administration of student aid programs) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0103 Tc -0.0497 Tw (Institutional legal representation) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0127 Tc 0.0127 Tw (Disclosure of institutional expenditures) Tj 239.4 53.76 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0087 Tc -0.0513 Tw (Trustee appointment process) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0155 Tc 0.0155 Tw (K-12/higher education communication and) Tj 0 -12.72 TD -0.0045 Tc 0 Tw (collaboration) Tj -18 -13.44 TD /F7 11.04 Tf -0.0384 Tc (\267) Tj 5.04 0 TD /F6 11.04 Tf 0 Tc 9.8909 Tw ( ) Tj 12.96 0 TD /F4 11.04 Tf -0.0136 Tc 0.0136 Tw (Resource sharing among institutions) Tj ET 39.36 382.92 0.48 0.48 re f 39.84 382.92 256.92 0.48 re f 296.76 382.92 0.48 0.48 re f 297.24 382.92 260.52 0.48 re f 557.76 382.92 0.48 0.48 re f 39.36 265.08 0.48 117.84 re f 39.36 264.6 0.48 0.48 re f 39.36 264.6 0.48 0.48 re f 39.84 264.6 256.92 0.48 re f 296.76 265.08 0.48 117.84 re f 296.76 264.6 0.48 0.48 re f 297.24 264.6 260.52 0.48 re f 557.76 265.08 0.48 117.84 re f 557.76 264.6 0.48 0.48 re f 557.76 264.6 0.48 0.48 re f BT 72 240.96 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0028 Tc 0.0028 Tw (Comparison with the Interim Survey) Tj ET 72 238.44 189.12 1.2 re f BT 72 221.4 TD /F5 12 Tf -0.0008 Tc 0.0008 Tw (The Restructuring of ӣƵ Higher Education: An Interim Report to the) Tj 370.92 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 3 0 TD /F5 12 Tf -0.0087 Tc 0.0087 Tw (Governor and) Tj -373.92 -13.8 TD -0.0052 Tc 0.0052 Tw (the ӣƵ Legislature) Tj 130.2 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.0024 Tc -0.0144 Tw (, which the Commission published in July of 1996, also contained) Tj -130.2 -13.8 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.0106 Tw (a survey component. There are both similarities and differences between the two surveys. A) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0039 Tc 0.0125 Tw (key difference is that while the first survey sought to measure changes in attitudes and) Tj T* -0.0035 Tc 0.0128 Tw (perceptions that had taken place since the time the restructuring was announced, the second) Tj T* -0.0021 Tc 0.0101 Tw (survey is concerned with current attitudes. Restructuring had solid support in 1996, as it does) Tj T* -0.0054 Tc 0.0214 Tw (now; sector differences that were found in 1998 were also present in 1996. However, one) Tj T* -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (organizational group \227 institutional trustees \227 seems to have become more positive and) Tj T* -0.002 Tc 0.0192 Tw (more willing to express an opinion now than before. Also, another group \227 Commission) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (members \227 seems to have become somewhat less positive \(though they remain as positive as) Tj T* -0.0059 Tc 0.0359 Tw (any of the groups except the non-Commission state officials\).) Tj ET endstream endobj 23 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 24 0 obj<>stream BT 477 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (9) Tj -363.96 658.92 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (IV. KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS UNDER RESTRUCTURING) Tj -63 -19.56 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (The Higher Education Restructuring Act of 1994 set high expectations for ӣƵ\222s new) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.0225 Tw (tripartite governance structure, and the survey identified a number of key areas perceived as) Tj T* -0.0053 Tc 0.0213 Tw (excellent or good as a result of restructuring. However, the survey was intended to gauge) Tj T* -0.0088 Tc 0.0408 Tw (perceptions of a broad constituency, and it did not address all of the one-time and ongoing) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (responsibilities assigned to the Commission on Higher Education, the Presidents\222 Council,) Tj T* -0.0031 Tc 0.0123 Tw (and institutional governing boards. This section addresses some of the most significant goals) Tj T* -0.0062 Tc 0.0287 Tw (achieved in the first five years under the new governance structure, largely as the result of the) Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (level of cooperation and collaboration that developed within the higher education system.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0138 Tw (At the individual colleges and universities, reduced state regulation has enabled boards of) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.0026 Tw (trustees to focus on institutional goals and be more responsive to student and community) Tj T* -0.0042 Tc 0.0128 Tw (needs. On a state level, the synergy that has developed among college and university) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (presidents, and between presidents and the Commission and other stakeholders has resulted in) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (many significant accomplishments that benefit students, institutions, and the state. The) Tj T* -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw (mechanism for collaboration between the Commission and the Presidents\222 Council was not) Tj T* -0.0114 Tc 0.0514 Tw (defined by the restructuring act and it has evolved over the years. In the past two years, the) Tj T* -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (Commission\222s Executive Committee and the officers of the Presidents\222 Council\222s Executive) Tj T* -0.0045 Tc 0.023 Tw (Board have forged a more productive working relationship. There is also frequent informal) Tj T* -0.0037 Tc 0.0146 Tw (dialogue between the Commission\222s executive director and the chair of the Presidents\222) Tj T* -0.0041 Tc 0.0133 Tw (Council on a variety of issues, and each body\222s regular monthly meetings provide an) Tj T* -0.0044 Tc 0.0215 Tw (opportunity for representatives of the other to offer more formal input. In addition, both) Tj T* -0.0049 Tc 0.0249 Tw (organizations have been represented on every major task force and committee formed since) Tj T* -0.0086 Tc 0 Tw (restructuring.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0062 Tc 0.0362 Tw (Much of the first year following restructuring was focused on completing statutorily required) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.0124 Tw (reports on funding and tuition, collaboration between higher education and K-12, student aid) Tj T* -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (administration, and collective bargaining and civil service in the state college and university) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0139 Tw (sector. These reports, submitted to the Governor and Legislature, have informed ongoing) Tj T* -0.0052 Tc 0.0271 Tw (policy and planning efforts, and several of the specific recommendations have been) Tj T* -0.005 Tc 0.005 Tw (successfully implemented.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0056 Tc 0.0333 Tw (The restructuring act also required the development of a master plan for higher education.) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0132 Tw (With significant involvement from the Presidents\222 Council and the rest of the higher) Tj T* -0.0028 Tc 0.0028 Tw (education community, the Commission adopted ) Tj 232.56 0 TD /F5 12 Tf 0.0008 Tc -0.0008 Tw (Looking to the New Millennium: New) Tj -232.56 -13.8 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (Jersey\222s Plan for Higher Education ) Tj 174.24 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (in October 1996. The first long-range plan since 1981) Tj -174.24 -13.8 TD -0.0047 Tc 0.018 Tw (established a vision for ӣƵ higher education \(see ) Tj 278.16 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.016 Tc -0.016 Tw (Appendix 2) Tj 59.16 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0195 Tc 0.0195 Tw (\) and made) Tj -337.32 -13.8 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0118 Tw (recommendations to guide colleges and universities, and the state, in achieving that vision.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.011 Tw (The first update of the long-range plan, released for public comment in March 1999, includes) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0122 Tw (a status report on the original recommendations, as well as new recommendations intended to) Tj T* -0.0037 Tc 0.0221 Tw (define a strategic course by which ӣƵ\222s system of colleges and universities will) Tj T* -0.0043 Tc 0.0143 Tw (become among the world\222s best. The major recommendations that have been implemented) Tj T* -0.0042 Tc 0.0042 Tw (from the original plan are:) Tj 36 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0077 Tc 0.0437 Tw (enactment of a $55 million Higher Education Technology Infrastructure Fund that) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (has allowed 45 eligible institutions to accelerate their technology plans and spurred) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0078 Tc 0.0478 Tw (systemwide collaboration to create the Virtual Academic Library Environment, the) Tj T* -0.003 Tc 0.018 Tw (ӣƵ Virtual University, and the proposed interinstitutional broadband) Tj ET endstream endobj 25 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 26 0 obj<>stream BT 471.96 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (10) Tj -367.92 659.16 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0053 Tc 0.0053 Tw (network backbone;) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0038 Tc 0.0138 Tw (a significant increase in operating aid for community colleges as well as an) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.0126 Tw (increase in the state bonding limit for community college facilities \(both were first) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0056 Tc 0.0227 Tw (recommended in the 1995 funding and tuition report\);) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0031 Tc 0.0031 Tw (a bond proposal that provides $550 million for capital improvements at four-year) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (colleges and universities \(first recommended in the 1995 funding and tuition) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0135 Tc 0 Tw (report\);) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0038 Tc 0.0158 Tw (development of a broad-based transfer and articulation agreement and a proposed) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (computerized system to facilitate student transfer;) Tj -18 -20.88 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0053 Tc 0.0238 Tw (creation of a $1 million grant program to improve graduation and transfer rates for) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (low-income or minority students; and) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0029 Tc 0.0129 Tw (completion of a statutorily required study of the capacity of the higher education) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0137 Tc 0 Tw (system.) Tj -54 -19.8 TD -0.0009 Tc 0.0118 Tw (In addition to these important outcomes from the long-range plan, the Commission,) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (Presidents\222 Council, and institutional boards have addressed a number of important ongoing) Tj T* -0.0044 Tc 0.0044 Tw (goals, which include:) Tj 36 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0041 Tc 0.0191 Tw (enhancing accountability and information about higher education through annual) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0049 Tc 0.0267 Tw (institutional and systemwide reports as well as the development of a performance) Tj 0 -13.8 TD 0.0009 Tc -0.0009 Tw (funding initiative for public institutions;) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0034 Tc 0.0167 Tw (developing and implementing the processes for licensure, new program review,) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (and the designation of university status;) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0033 Tc 0.0166 Tw (strengthening the three grant programs administered by the Commission \(Special) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0052 Tc 0.0292 Tw (Needs, College Bound, and Education of Language Minority Students\) by working) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0039 Tc 0.0148 Tw (closely with institutions and the advisory boards for each to implement key) Tj T* -0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw (recommendations that came out of comprehensive reviews of the programs;) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0071 Tc 0.0398 Tw (strengthening the EOF program by working closely with the EOF Board of) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (Directors and institutional program directors to improve administration and) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0072 Tc 0.0472 Tw (enhance state-level planning; and) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (increasing collaboration with business, K-12, and government agencies.) Tj -54 -19.68 TD -0.003 Tc 0.0115 Tw (A full list of the major activities implemented since the enactment of the Higher Education) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0094 Tc 0.0334 Tw (Restructuring Act is included as ) Tj 156.84 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.016 Tc -0.016 Tw (Appendix 2) Tj 59.16 0 TD /F8 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (.) Tj ET endstream endobj 27 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 28 0 obj<>stream BT 471.96 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (11) Tj -373.44 658.92 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (V. CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION RESTRUCTURING) Tj -48.48 -27.36 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0059 Tc 0.0359 Tw (An important aspect of the five-year assessment of restructuring was a daylong conference) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0117 Tw (that provided a unique opportunity for ӣƵ\222s higher education community to focus on) Tj T* -0.0041 Tc 0.0225 Tw (both the improvements fostered by the new governance structure and the challenges that lie) Tj T* -0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw (ahead. On January 22, 1999, over 150 institutional leaders, trustees, faculty and union) Tj T* -0.03 Tc 0 Tw (repr) Tj 19.2 0 TD -0.048 Tc (e) Tj 5.28 0 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0151 Tw (sentatives, students, Commission members, legislators, and others gathered at Rider) Tj -24.48 -13.8 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0155 Tw (University to hear presentations and participate in discussions about higher education) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (restructuring in ӣƵ.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0067 Tc 0.0344 Tw (Governor Christine Todd Whitman shared her views on restructuring and her vision for New) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.0201 Tw (Jersey higher education. A panel of legislators and others instrumental in the passage of the) Tj T* -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (Higher Education Restructuring Act discussed their perceptions about restructuring and the) Tj T* -0.0073 Tc 0.033 Tw (challenges higher education faces in the future. In addition, a panel of higher educ) Tj 397.08 0 TD -0.048 Tc 0 Tw (a) Tj 5.28 0 TD 0.012 Tc (tion) Tj -402.36 -13.8 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0248 Tw (policy experts from throughout the country placed ӣƵ\222s governance reform in a) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (national context and also discussed how institutions and the state might build upon the early) Tj T* -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (successes of restructuring.) Tj 0 -19.8 TD -0.0028 Tc 0.0137 Tw (Following the presentations, participants broke into small groups to discuss the specific) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0029 Tw (aspects of restructuring that received less-positive ratings in the survey.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0041 Tc -0.0041 Tw (Key themes from presentations and panels) Tj ET 72 440.04 217.68 1.2 re f BT 72 422.76 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0081 Tc 0.0481 Tw (Governor Whitman\222s Keynote Address) Tj ET 72 420.84 188.04 0.6 re f BT 72 408.72 TD -0.006 Tc 0.0231 Tw (While the Governor believes it may be too soon to judge whether restructuring has been) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (successful, she noted that it has improved coordination and collaboration within the higher) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (education system and made it more responsive to students, the business community, and the) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0062 Tc 0.0319 Tw (state. She indicated that presidents are working together in an unprecedented way, and the) Tj T* -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (increased autonomy has unleashed institutional creativity, while maintaining the state\222s) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0033 Tc 0.0118 Tw (commitment to quality, access, and affordability. She said the higher level of autonomy is) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0049 Tc 0.0289 Tw (accompanied by accountability, such as the state\222s new performance funding initiative.) Tj 0 -27.96 TD -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (Panel on the Higher Education Restructuring Act) Tj ET 72 294.84 235.8 0.6 re f BT 72 282.72 TD -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (The panelists agreed that increasing trustees\222 responsibility for institutional vision, quality,) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.011 Tw (and accountability is desirable and appropriate, and that more focus is needed on how trustees) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0033 Tc 0.0118 Tw (fulfill their important role. The legislators agreed that trustees, as well as college and) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0059 Tc 0.0316 Tw (university presidents, can be very effective advocates for their institutions and the system as a) Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (whole. Panelists also noted that colleges and universities must respond to the public agenda) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0158 Tw (and play a role in addressing critical state needs and social issues) Tj 312.12 0 TD /F9 11.04 Tf 0.0509 Tc 0 Tw (. ) Tj 9.36 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.009 Tc 0.009 Tw (While ӣƵ is seen) Tj -321.48 -14.04 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.0104 Tw (as a national leader in need-based student aid, legislators see a need to provide more financial) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (assistance to middle-class residents.) Tj 0 -27.96 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (Panel of National Experts) Tj ET 72 154.8 123.48 0.6 re f BT 72 142.68 TD -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (The panel of national experts praised what has been accomplished in ӣƵ under the) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0084 Tc 0.0564 Tw (new governance structure, although they cautioned against focusing on the governance) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (structure rather than statewide needs and long-term goals. They also noted that many of the) Tj T* -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw (issues identified as needing improvement reflect broad national trends, not problems with) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.0246 Tw (ӣƵ\222s new governance structure. Although survey respondents related issues such as) Tj ET endstream endobj 29 0 obj 19189 endobj 30 0 obj 19189 endobj 31 0 obj 0 endobj 32 0 obj 0 endobj 33 0 obj<>stream  POS/2tmVcmapBz2Bcvt ?tfpgm<: glyf~zmhead:#6hhea $hmtxż  jlocaiiyy:maxp! name)#!post%σ*VkprephL|D433fMONO@ q   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~(>~~ O\_   " & 0 3 : < > D  !!!!"!&!.!^!!"""""""")"+"H"a"e###!%%% %%%%%$%,%4%<%l%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%&<&@&B&`&c&f&k ~Q^   & 0 2 9 < > D  !!!!"!&!.![!!"""""""")"+"H"`"d### %%% %%%%%$%,%4%<%P%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%&:&@&B&`&c&e&jR  x;.4jy߲ߠޖޢދާ!q_0NA2TSJGDA>70)"ۀܳjSPO20/,1vvhlznVVXT,.*bcdefghjikmlnoqprsutvwxzy{}|~RSTUVW   XYZ[\]  ^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~ !"#$%&'()*+,-./0F:GIIKLMNQ!l6KKK^,?W~*E EG7rEYtGH#Tdef K %(QKWCFGy DMb]/7HksP'%GNm- vt/8?V4;O\ +HY`osv{)23hp*/[.4 '2=ACQbn{Rfi4LIaU 00AJJJKNPV_bimwx57?V$$)*KQo*P 2[Zk"l. f>Vz  $,-.@CDEGRRSU\chlnooswx{  $'7;>NU\dforr6=BDSSXp%5f 6!AIkUY"vo-e=!'/J;ge a/df"+l#/oPZv=f;2M1L^!$#9@9:98743210/.-,+*)('&%$#"!  ,E#F` &`&#HH-,E#F#a &a&#HH-,E#F` a F`&#HH-,E#F#a ` &a a&#HH-,E#F`@a f`&#HH-,E#F#a@` &a@a&#HH-, <<-, E# D# ZQX# D#Y QX# MD#Y &QX# D#Y!!-, EhD ` EFvhE`D-, C#Ce -, C#C -,F#pF>F#pFE: -,EJ#DEI#D-, E%EadPQXED!!Y-,Cc#b#B+-, EC`D-,CCe -, i@a ,b`+ d#da\XaY-,E+G#DGz-,TX CTXJIDDYY-,CXE+G#DGzEi G#D QX+G#DGz!GzYY-,-,KRX!ED#E %ERXD!!YY-,/-, %EI#DEJ#DEe#E %`j #B#hj`a Ry!J@JE TX#!?#YaDRyI@ IE TX#!?#YaD-,C#C -,C#C -, C#C -, C#Ce -,C#Ce -,C#Ce -,KRXED!!Y-, %#I@` c RX#%8#%e8c8!!!!!Y-,Ei C`:-,%# `#-,%# a#-,%-, ` <<-, a <<-,++**-,CC -,>**-,5-,vK#p KE PXaY:/-,!! d#d@b-,!QX d#d b@/+Y`-,!QX d#dUb/+Y`-, d#d@b`#!-,&&&&Eh:-,&&&&Ehe:-,E# E %PX&a&`YD-,F#F`F# F`ab# #KKpE` PXa@Yh:-,3+**-,CXY-,CXY-,KS#KQZX E`D!!Y-,KS#KQZX8!!Y-%\\+ %/?10!!%!! @  *@ / ? O o   L ]q?10%2#"&5462FF32GGH24HH33Hk _<80|#3 E N 99^ossik bE999sess`ssmssuss|sv99FEFQ a9FVj9h`BLs9SV@"T9oVP9t4 V:6#%J"ses=mW/Lc+1^32eCE=sk4q38L95L0L+bm*IT9o6sesesesesese=WWWW11-CEEEEE888893bssk>##&.d+9R5ddd@+.d>1f %G^pE]^EdTs3dhhL9oDOsK J?d/L+V~E,CF49E )BLBLBLBL9o9oR9o6661= h]<V qJb*9 >L+V*Er}%PVj9hLcBL q==msese9F5m9 WWL1V@2V@2V@2TCTC9oE4444 qV:3V:36868JbJb*`?o?o<PErMEI%`EPSL- NPka#OOOjE\\Nse==WWW9hLc9hLc9hLc`+`+BLBLBLBL1s^9S31V@2TCZ`C9oE9oE44 qV:368686868#95L+3se+^p9RE9NVha`J`9oBL9S"Te9o`VPJV:W%;69NBLqE^C08qEeLE^ECs[03b8LEEL;EE%8Eq8E08E8Eh:` BLBLs$`5:`+``a`X5 9Y```$"`9o`VPV:+X%`)``:B`q`o`&seJL00 Wo0>000100E0==L+ EL0000070>00W+0Eq1^00+0L+1X`0#95#95#95L+FssTZE"~~~~~~~0 0 *Uo@@7@@%UOK@'''''''''''''''''RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR<q#;Z( M ?0K{0  0  0 0' W 0o   9 0E u 0   00/0A q0} 0 0  % 01  a 0mTypeface The Monotype Corporation plc. Data The Monotype Corporation plc / Type Solutions Inc. 1990-91 All Rights Reserved.PHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookRegularPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookVersion 2.20PHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookCentury Schoolbook is a registered trademark of The Monotype Corporation plc.normalPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookStandardPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookTypeface The Monotype Corporation plc. Data The Monotype Corporation plc / Type Solutions Inc. 1990-91 All Rights Reserved.PHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookRegularPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookVersion 2.20PHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookCentury Schoolbook is a registered trademark of The Monotype Corporation plc.NormalPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookNormaaliPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookNormalPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookNormalePHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookStandaardPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookNormalPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookNormalPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookNormalPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookNormalPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbookNormalPHOJDI+CenturySchoolbook3f      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~spaceexclamquotedbl numbersigndollarpercent ampersand quotesingle parenleft parenrightasteriskpluscommahyphenperiodslashzeroonetwothreefourfivesixseveneightninecolon semicolonlessequalgreaterquestionatABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ bracketleft backslash bracketright asciicircum underscoregraveabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz braceleftbar braceright asciitilde AdieresisAringCcedillaEacuteNtilde Odieresis Udieresisaacuteagrave acircumflex adieresisatildearingccedillaeacuteegrave ecircumflex edieresisiacuteigrave icircumflex idieresisntildeoacuteograve ocircumflex odieresisotildeuacuteugrave ucircumflex udieresisdaggerdegreecentsterlingsectionbullet paragraph germandbls registered copyright trademarkacutedieresisnotequalAEOslashinfinity plusminus lessequal greaterequalyenmu1 partialdiff summationproductpi1integral ordfeminine ordmasculineOhmaeoslash questiondown exclamdown logicalnotradicalflorin approxequal increment guillemotleftguillemotrightellipsisnbspaceAgraveAtildeOtildeOEoeendashemdash quotedblleft quotedblright quoteleft quoterightdividelozenge ydieresis Ydieresisfractioncurrency guilsinglleftguilsinglrightfifl daggerdblperiodcenteredquotesinglbase quotedblbase perthousand Acircumflex EcircumflexAacute EdieresisEgraveIacute Icircumflex IdieresisIgraveOacute OcircumflexappleOgraveUacute UcircumflexUgravedotlessi circumflextildemacronbreve dotaccentringcedilla hungarumlautogonekcaronLslashlslashScaronscaronZcaronzcaron brokenbarEthethYacuteyacuteThornthornminusmultiply onesuperior twosuperior threesuperioronehalf onequarter threequartersfrancGbrevegbreveIdotScedillascedillaCacutecacuteCcaronccarondmacron overscoremiddot foursuperiorAbreveabreveAogonekaogonekDcarondcaronDslashEogonekeogonekEcaronecaronIJijLacutelacuteLcaronlcaronLdotldotNacutenacuteNcaronncaron napostrophe Odblacute odblacuteRacuteracuteRcaronrcaronSacutesacuteTcedillatcedillaTcarontcaronUringuring Udblacute udblacuteZacutezacuteZdotzdotnoGammanoThetanoPhinoalphanodelta noepsilonnosigmanotaunophi underscoredblminutesecond exclamdbl nsuperiorpeseta afii61248 afii61289 arrowleftarrowup arrowright arrowdown arrowboth arrowupdn arrowupdnbse orthogonal intersection equivalenceH22073H18543H18551H18533 openbullet commaaccentAmacronamacron Ccircumflex ccircumflexCdotcdotEmacronemacronEbreveebreveEdotedot Gcircumflex gcircumflexGdotgdotGcedillagcedilla Hcircumflex hcircumflexHbarhbarItildeitildeImacronimacronIbreveibreveIogonekiogonek Jcircumflex jcircumflexKcedillakcedilla kgreenlandicLcedillalcedillaNcedillancedillaEngengOmacronomacronObreveobreveRcedillarcedilla Scircumflex scircumflexTbartbarUtildeutildeUmacronumacronUbreveubreveUogonekuogonek Wcircumflex wcircumflex Ycircumflex ycircumflexlongs Aringacute aringacuteAEacuteaeacute Oslashacute oslashacutetonos dieresistonos Alphatonos anoteleia EpsilontonosEtatonos Iotatonos Omicrontonos Upsilontonos OmegatonosiotadieresistonosAlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaThetaIotaKappaLambdaMuNuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonPhiChiPsiOmega IotadieresisUpsilondieresis alphatonos epsilontonosetatonos iotatonosupsilondieresistonosalphabetagammadeltaepsilonzetaetathetaiotakappalambdamunuxiomicronrhosigma1sigmatauupsilonphichipsiomega iotadieresisupsilondieresis omicrontonos upsilontonos omegatonos afii10023 afii10051 afii10052 afii10053 afii10054 afii10055 afii10056 afii10057 afii10058 afii10059 afii10060 afii10061 afii10062 afii10145 afii10017 afii10018 afii10019 afii10020 afii10021 afii10022 afii10024 afii10025 afii10026 afii10027 afii10028 afii10029 afii10030 afii10031 afii10032 afii10033 afii10034 afii10035 afii10036 afii10037 afii10038 afii10039 afii10040 afii10041 afii10042 afii10043 afii10044 afii10045 afii10046 afii10047 afii10048 afii10049 afii10065 afii10066 afii10067 afii10068 afii10069 afii10070 afii10072 afii10073 afii10074 afii10075 afii10076 afii10077 afii10078 afii10079 afii10080 afii10081 afii10082 afii10083 afii10084 afii10085 afii10086 afii10087 afii10088 afii10089 afii10090 afii10091 afii10092 afii10093 afii10094 afii10095 afii10096 afii10097 afii10071 afii10099 afii10100 afii10101 afii10102 afii10103 afii10104 afii10105 afii10106 afii10107 afii10108 afii10109 afii10110 afii10193 afii10050 afii10098WgravewgraveWacutewacute Wdieresis wdieresisYgraveygrave afii00208 quotereversed radicalex afii08941 afii61352 estimated oneeighth threeeighths fiveeighths seveneighthshouse revlogicalnot integraltp integralbtSF100000SF110000SF010000SF030000SF020000SF040000SF080000SF090000SF060000SF070000SF050000SF430000SF240000SF510000SF520000SF390000SF220000SF210000SF250000SF500000SF490000SF380000SF280000SF270000SF260000SF360000SF370000SF420000SF190000SF200000SF230000SF470000SF480000SF410000SF450000SF460000SF400000SF540000SF530000SF440000upblockdnblockblocklfblockrtblockltshadeshadedkshade filledbox filledrecttriaguptriagrttriagdntriaglfcircle invbullet invcircle smileface invsmilefacesunfemalemalespadeclubheartdiamond musicalnotemusicalnotedblundercommaaccent fivesuperior sevensuperior eightsuperiorA @Zt_֟t֝?~_~KyU: AG0GGGG0@@Z`ZX_@ z_<_@ 0[@[[_#XpA 0@\@ jpk:A9D/D_D`DDDDDDDD0@P@P`p@ k 0@PUU U0U@UPU 0@Pkk k0k@kPkWW W0W@W@PWPoP 0@00@@0v@v0z@zvvzz 9yy0@__// // ??0 0OO@ @__P Poo` `p p      @   / ?0 O@ _P o` p       ////??__  ??oo  / ?0 O@ _P o` p        @FF@H H2 ղH2 ԲH2 ҲH2 ͲH2 ̲H2 òH2 \H2 ZH2 XH2 WH2 UH2 QH2 OH2 H2 H2 H2 @cH2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 H2 {H2 zH2 vH2 jH2 dH2 _H2 ]H2 [H2 XH2 H2 ˲H2 ȲH2 @H2 H2 H2 H2 H2  ^@@wrcaV$"   KKSBKcKb S# QZ#BKKTB8+KR7+KP[XYTXCX7YY++++++++++++++++++++++++++++KPyx+++KSyx+++PKa`++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++EiSBKPXBYC\XBY CX`!YBp>CX;!~ +Y #B #BCX-A-A +Y#B#BCX~;! +Y#B#Bsusstuuuusssstst^s^tssttttuuuuu+tsuts+++ts+++t+++++++++ts++tu++u+sEh Eh@` #DEhlEh@`"#D endstream endobj 34 0 obj<> endobj 35 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 36 0 obj<>stream BT 471.96 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (12) Tj -421.92 658.8 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0031 Tc 0.014 Tw (budget, master planning, and coordination of programs to restructuring, such issues pose) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0021 Tc 0.0107 Tw (challenges for all states, regardless of their governance structure. The panel also stressed that) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0037 Tc 0.0137 Tw (to be most effective, the higher education community must approach advocacy with clear) Tj 0 -14.16 TD -0.0056 Tc 0.0256 Tw (common goals and a strong central voice.) Tj 0 -23.88 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0032 Tc -0.0032 Tw (Key themes from breakout discussion groups) Tj ET 72 640.32 231 1.2 re f BT 72 622.92 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.036 Tc 0 Tw (Advocacy) Tj ET 72 621 48.24 0.6 re f BT 72 602.88 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (Despite a closer working relationship between the Commission and Presidents\222 Council in) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.0272 Tw (areas related to budget development and advocacy, some participants still expressed concerns) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0064 Tc 0.0321 Tw (that the governance structure lacks a central advocate for higher education. There was general) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.0133 Tw (agreement that both the Commission and Presidents\222 Council should play a stronger and more) Tj T* -0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw (visible role as advocates for higher education. The two entities should work together to define) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0066 Tc 0.0291 Tw (roles and expectations and develop a plan and agenda for advocacy. Some felt the absence of) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.015 Tw (cabinet-level status for the Commission is detrimental to advocacy efforts. More trustee) Tj T* -0.0031 Tc 0.0117 Tw (involvement in advocacy is also needed. Participants agreed that ӣƵ should do more) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (to raise public awareness about the benefits/importance of higher education and to market its) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0278 Tw (higher education system. Expanding and strengthening relationships with business and) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (industry are an important part of this effort.) Tj 0 -19.92 TD -0.006 Tc 0.006 Tw (Budget Development Process) Tj ET 72 441 141.72 0.6 re f BT 72 422.88 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.013 Tw (As noted above, participants expressed concern that while FY 2000 was an improvement over) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0219 Tw (past years, the budget development process had often lacked coordination, and as a result, was) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (not as effective as possible. They stressed the need for the Commission and Presidents\222) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (Council to coordinate efforts and speak with one voice, being proactive early in the process) Tj T* -0.0059 Tc 0.0336 Tw (rather than reactive. They agreed that the state must provide adequate, consistent, predictable) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0135 Tw (support for base budgets, and should consider multi-year budgeting, or at least multi-year) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0096 Tc 0.0096 Tw (budget planning.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD -0.0111 Tc 0.0111 Tw (Master Planning) Tj ET 72 316.92 78.72 0.6 re f BT 72 298.92 TD -0.0027 Tc 0.0027 Tw (The breakout groups recommended that the Commission increase its efforts to communicate) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0008 Tc 0.0008 Tw (the substance of the long-range plan and its relevance to various constituencies. Some) Tj T* -0.0033 Tc 0.0113 Tw (expressed dissatisfaction with the plan itself. Others felt the plan and updates should be well) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.0231 Tw (circulated and referred to frequently, as a foundation upon which to base policy decisions.) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw (Institutions should seek to align their plans with the state plan. While participants believe that) Tj T* -0.0033 Tc 0.0133 Tw (restructuring has allowed for broader input in statewide planning, there is not equal) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0039 Tc 0.0139 Tw (involvement among all institutional constituents. They said trustees should be more involved) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.006 Tc 0.006 Tw (in updating the long-range plan.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD -0.0055 Tc 0.0055 Tw (Coordination of Academic Programming) Tj ET 72 178.92 196.68 0.6 re f BT 72 160.92 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.0312 Tw (Breakout group participants had differing opinions regarding coordination of academic) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (programming. Some saw improvement and believe that the process is working; they believe) Tj T* -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (that the Commission\222s coordination role is appropriate and the system of checks and balances) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0111 Tw (is sufficient. One group raised questions about whether there is a need to monitor/control) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0021 Tc 0.0121 Tw (program quality. It was suggested that the long-range plan should provide more context) Tj T* -0.0032 Tc 0.0132 Tw (within which academic program decisions are made. One group suggested that the) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.0026 Tw (requirements for new program documentation should be reviewed and that licensure) Tj ET endstream endobj 37 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 38 0 obj<>stream BT 471.96 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (13) Tj -421.92 658.8 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0041 Tc 0.0212 Tw (regulations also should be reviewed periodically. Others felt a need to define \223unduly costly) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0033 Tc 0.0142 Tw (and unduly duplicative.\224 One group felt that academic programming through distance) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0037 Tc 0.0137 Tw (learning may pose problems related to quality and systemwide efficiency in the future.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (Statewide Coordination of Higher Education) Tj ET 72 658.92 214.44 0.6 re f BT 72 640.92 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.0123 Tw (Participants agreed that the Commission should play a role in identifying statewide issues and) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0063 Tc 0.0363 Tw (the \223public interest,\224 as well as in spurring and assessing higher education\222s responsiveness.) Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (However, some expressed concern that statewide coordination must be balanced with) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (sensitivity to institutional mission, as well as the need for institutional flexibility. Areas) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0315 Tw (identified as needing additional statewide focus include: transfer and articulation,) Tj T* -0.0027 Tc 0.0177 Tw (outmigration/inmigration, collaboration with K-12, and outcomes assessments and criteria.) Tj 0 -19.92 TD -0.0133 Tc 0.1333 Tw (Miscellaneous Issues) Tj ET 72 549 101.4 0.6 re f BT 72 530.88 TD -0.0042 Tc 0.0242 Tw (Another issue raised by the breakout groups was whether the Presidents\222 Council can) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0036 Tc 0.0121 Tw (maintain strong leadership in the future given its heavy reliance on volunteerism, and the need) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0125 Tw (for a common orientation/understanding of all presidents on issues related to restructuring and) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0037 Tc 0.0123 Tw (the vision for higher education. Another concern was the political nature of the trustee) Tj T* -0.0038 Tc 0.0171 Tw (appointment process, especially in light of the trustees\222 expanded role.) Tj ET endstream endobj 39 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 40 0 obj<>stream BT 471.96 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (14) Tj -330.6 658.68 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS) Tj -91.32 -23.88 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (When the Higher Education Restructuring Act was enacted in 1994, people in ӣƵ and) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.006 Tc 0.0337 Tw (across the nation questioned whether the new structure could work. Could college and) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0008 Tc -0.0117 Tw (university presidents move beyond the needs of their individual institutions to address) Tj T* -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (statewide issues? Could a body of lay members with little or no background in higher) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0144 Tw (education successfully guide state coordination and planning? Or, absent a cabinet-level) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0037 Tc 0.0157 Tw (representative and an extensive higher education bureaucracy, would the state ultimately) Tj T* -0.0048 Tc 0.0248 Tw (abandon its commitment to access and affordability?) Tj 0 -19.68 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0114 Tw (While the assessment of the new governance structure and its component entities points to) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0065 Tc 0.0342 Tw (some operational areas that need attention, the experience of the past five years has) Tj T* -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (demonstrated clearly that the tripartite structure is workable and desirable. Since July 1994,) Tj T* -0.0038 Tc 0.0138 Tw (ӣƵ\222s higher education system has both labored and prospered under the new) Tj T* -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (governance structure. The tripartite arrangement spurred institutional autonomy,) Tj T* -0.0027 Tc 0.0147 Tw (collaboration, and innovation within a coordinated higher education system. Considerable) Tj T* -0.0049 Tc 0.0199 Tw (progress has been made toward system and state goals due to significant efforts on the part of) Tj T* -0.0043 Tc 0.0163 Tw (presidents, trustees, the Commission, and others in the higher education community.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0141 Tw (With a profound commitment to make the new governance structure successful, the) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Commission and Presidents\222 Council embraced their respective and joint responsibilities and) Tj T* -0.0055 Tc 0.0313 Tw (undertook them energetically. As a result, they made concerted efforts during the first two) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw (years to increase systemwide collaboration and communication, to complete statutorily) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.031 Tw (required studies and reports, and to establish required processes and regulations. There was a) Tj T* -0.0024 Tc 0.0133 Tw (synergy that drove those efforts, and the resulting policy recommendations, processes, and) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0074 Tc 0.0474 Tw (procedures established the framework for the many accomplishments over the past five years.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD -0.0014 Tc 0.0123 Tw (While the various higher education entities embraced their respective and joint responsibilities) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0141 Tw (immediately, the relationships between those entities have evolved and improved over time.) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0013 Tc 0.0133 Tw (For example, the recently increased level of communication between the Commission\222s) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0138 Tw (Executive Committee and the officers of the Presidents\222 Council has greatly improved budget) Tj T* -0.0064 Tc 0.0464 Tw (development and advocacy efforts.) Tj 36 -19.92 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.024 Tc 0 Tw (R) Tj 8.64 0 TD /F3 9.48 Tf 0.0086 Tc (ECOMMENDATIONS) Tj 94.92 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.036 Tc (:) Tj 3.96 0 TD 0.0042 Tc -0.0042 Tw ( Frequent and stronger lines of communication between) Tj -107.52 -14.04 TD 0.0065 Tc -0.0322 Tw (the two bodies, as well as with boards of trustees, will further enhance the ability) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0042 Tc 0.0192 Tw (of the structure to meet system and state needs.) Tj 0 -19.92 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Similarly, communication and collaboration among the institutions and sectors) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0011 Tc -0.0011 Tw (have increased substantially, but will require additional attention. All) Tj T* 0.0051 Tc -0.0318 Tw (relationships need ongoing nurturing and development, and this will be) Tj 0 -13.92 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (particularly necessary, both among the institutions and among the coordinating) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0043 Tc 0.0176 Tw (entities, to ensure the continued success of this governance structure.) Tj -36 -20.04 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (Given the focus on institutional autonomy in the new structure, there is a natural tension) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0103 Tw (between campus interests and the interests of the system and the state. While individual) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0047 Tc 0.0287 Tw (institutions rightfully embraced the opportunity to move forward expeditiously, without the) Tj T* -0.0054 Tc 0.0294 Tw (burden of excessive regulatory oversight, the coordinating entities attempted to guide) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0034 Tc 0.0184 Tw (institutional plans and policy with statewide planning and initiatives.) Tj ET endstream endobj 41 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 42 0 obj<>stream BT 471.96 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (15) Tj -385.92 658.8 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.024 Tc (R) Tj 8.64 0 TD /F3 9.48 Tf 0.0085 Tc (ECOMMENDATION) Tj 89.64 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.036 Tc (:) Tj 3.96 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj 6 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0016 Tc 0.0224 Tw (As the system matures, it is essential for institutions to help) Tj -108.24 -13.92 TD 0.0047 Tc -0.0167 Tw (establish and maintain an ongoing balance between the interests of individual) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0021 Tc -0.0021 Tw (institutions and broader statewide needs and goals.) Tj -36 -20.04 TD /F4 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (The Commission on Higher Education is also faced with the need to balance institutional and) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0013 Tc 0.0122 Tw (statewide interests. As the coordinating agency for higher education, the Commission) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0033 Tc 0.0142 Tw (engages in planning, policy development, research, and advocacy to meet higher education) Tj T* -0.0072 Tc 0.0472 Tw (and statewide goals established by the restructuring act and through subsequent policy and) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0042 Tc 0.0142 Tw (law. The restructuring act specifically created the position of executive director of the) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.003 Tc 0.0139 Tw (Commission as a non-cabinet position appointed by the Commission rather than the) Tj T* -0.0034 Tc 0.012 Tw (Governor, as the most appropriate means to deal with the inherent tension between the needs) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (of the institutions and the state.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (The non-cabinet status of the executive director has been questioned by some, suggesting that) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.031 Tw (higher education does not have a sufficiently strong voice and level of importance within the) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.014 Tw (administration. Others believe that higher education has maintained a strong working) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0235 Tw (relationship with the Governor and her staff as evidenced by the Governor\222s implementation) Tj T* -0.0029 Tc 0.0138 Tw (of several Commission recommendations and her frequent inclusion of the executive director) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0043 Tc 0.03 Tw (at cabinet meetings and affairs. In fact, the lines of communication between the Commission) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.003 Tc 0.0123 Tw (and the Governor\222s office, as well as with the Treasurer, are open and positive.) Tj 36 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.024 Tc 0 Tw (R) Tj 8.64 0 TD /F3 9.48 Tf 0.0085 Tc (ECOMMENDATION) Tj 89.64 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.036 Tc (:) Tj 3.96 0 TD 0.002 Tc -0.002 Tw ( The Commission should continuously monitor the) Tj -102.24 -13.92 TD 0.0027 Tc -0.0147 Tw (relationship with the administration to ensure that good communication and a) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.002 Tc -0.0154 Tw (strong working relationship with the Governor\222s office, the Treasurer, and) Tj T* 0.0024 Tc -0.0158 Tw (essential staff are maintained over time and with future administrations.) Tj -36 -19.92 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0047 Tc 0.0232 Tw (There are some responsibilities within the structure that require attention, and in some cases) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.004 Tc 0.0115 Tw (the draft long-range plan update addresses them. One of those concerns is the adequacy of the) Tj T* -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (long-range plan itself. While significant strides have been made in implementation of) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (initiatives identified in the long-range plan for higher education, there is a need to move the) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (plan beyond the identification of individual recommendations and develop a strategic course) Tj T* -0.0038 Tc 0.0118 Tw (to achieve the plan\222s vision. The draft long-range plan update addresses that need, using the) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0058 Tc 0.0316 Tw (existing plan as a framework and defining the course to make ӣƵ higher education) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (competitive with the best in the world. The plan\222s structural design for regular update and) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0224 Tw (review will provide appropriate means to monitor progress and revise the course if necessary.) Tj 0 -19.92 TD -0.005 Tc 0.0222 Tw (In another area, the assessment of the structure confirmed the importance of the role of) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.0126 Tw (trustees in overseeing institutional matters and fulfilling the missions of their colleges and) Tj T* -0.0041 Tc 0.0133 Tw (universities, as well as in striving to meet statewide goals in cooperation with other) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.014 Tw (institutions and the coordinating entities. Clearly, trustees are volunteers serving individual) Tj 0 -14.04 TD -0.0027 Tc 0.0137 Tw (institutions, and while they are not necessarily statewide spokespersons for higher education,) Tj T* -0.0028 Tc 0.0114 Tw (their advocacy for their own institutions plays a critical role in fostering an understanding of) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0044 Tc 0.013 Tw (the overall value of the investment in higher education and the system as a whole.) Tj 36 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.024 Tc 0 Tw (R) Tj 8.64 0 TD /F3 9.48 Tf 0.0086 Tc (ECOMMENDATIONS) Tj 94.92 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.036 Tc (:) Tj 3.96 0 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw ( The role of trustees as a critical part of the tripartite) Tj -107.52 -14.04 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (structure should be more clearly defined and emphasized, particularly in regard) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0076 Tc 0.0076 Tw (to advocacy.) Tj 63.24 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 6 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0019 Tc -0.0152 Tw (The Commission should establish a task force that includes trustees) Tj -69.24 -14.04 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.0133 Tw (to better define the role trustees should play and recommend mechanisms for) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (involving them in statewide policy and planning efforts. ) Tj 287.04 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 3 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0106 Tc 0.0406 Tw (At the same time, the) Tj ET endstream endobj 43 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 44 0 obj<>stream BT 471.96 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (16) Tj -385.92 658.8 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (trustee appointment process should be improved in regard to ensuring the timely) Tj 0 -13.92 TD 0.0045 Tc -0.0216 Tw (appointment of highly qualified individuals, independent of political) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0024 Tc 0 Tw (considerations.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD 0.0009 Tc -0.0009 Tw (The area of advocacy also needs attention in regard to establishing a strong) Tj 0 -13.92 TD 0.0039 Tc -0.0139 Tw (central voice for higher education. The Commission should step forward to fill) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0024 Tc -0.0124 Tw (this gap and strengthen its role as an advocate for higher education, as) Tj T* 0.002 Tc -0.002 Tw (recommended in the draft long-range plan update.) Tj 259.08 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 3 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0063 Tc -0.0063 Tw (The Commission should) Tj -262.08 -13.92 TD -0.0021 Tc 0.013 Tw (develop and initiate strategies to raise the level of awareness of higher) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.001 Tc -0.001 Tw (education\222s societal and economic contributions and strengthen overall support) Tj T* 0.0051 Tc -0.0051 Tw (for higher education.) Tj -36 -19.68 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0035 Tc 0.0144 Tw (A last suggestion to enhance operations within the governance structure concerns the) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (statewide coordination of new programs and mission expansion. While the review process for) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0.0122 Tw (new programs has fostered flexibility and the more timely delivery of new programs, the issue) Tj T* -0.0049 Tc 0.0209 Tw (of lack of coordination of academic programs statewide was identified in a 1998 survey and at) Tj T* -0.0034 Tc 0.0134 Tw (the January 1999 Restructuring Assessment Conference as an area in need of improvement.) Tj 36 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.024 Tc 0 Tw (R) Tj 8.64 0 TD /F3 9.48 Tf 0.0085 Tc (ECOMMENDATION) Tj 89.64 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.036 Tc (:) Tj 3.96 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj 6 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (The long-range plan update appropriately recommends that) Tj -108.24 -14.04 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (the Presidents\222 Council should consider developing qualitative criteria to guide) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0035 Tc -0.0035 Tw (boards of trustees and institutions under their authority when proposing new) Tj 0 -13.92 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (programs. The Presidents\222 Council should also revisit the new program review) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0016 Tc -0.0016 Tw (process with the intention of establishing rigorous and consistent criteria that will) Tj T* 0 Tc -0 Tw (be used to determine whether proposed programs are \223unduly duplicative\224 or) Tj 0 -13.92 TD 0.0026 Tc -0.0176 Tw (\223unduly expensive.\224 The Commission should similarly review both ) Tj 344.4 0 TD -0.0072 Tc 0.0072 Tw (its process) Tj ET 534.6 395.04 0.72 14.04 re f BT 108 383.76 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (and criteria for petitions to exceed or change institutional missions.) Tj ET 534.6 371.04 0.72 24 re f BT 72 360.24 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0058 Tc 0.0335 Tw (As a final comment, while the restructuring assessment confirms the validity of the current) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0034 Tc 0.0126 Tw (higher education governance structure, it is the actions and relationships of those who operate) Tj T* -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (within the structure that are critical to its success. The early commitment and synergy that) Tj T* -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (resulted in significant accomplishments and collaboration under the new structure have) Tj T* -0.0048 Tc 0.0288 Tw (lessened somewhat as the years passed. While there continues to be a strong commitment to) Tj T* -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (the structure from some, the interest and devotion of time to making it work has subsided to a) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0.0186 Tw (degree, as would be expected. The level of time and effort put forth initially by institutional) Tj T* -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (presidents and volunteer Commission members was extraordinary in light of their respective) Tj T* -0.0037 Tc 0.0255 Tw (responsibilities for running an institution or maintaining another full-time occupation. While) Tj T* -0.0033 Tc 0.0108 Tw (the level of effort needed now to effectively operate the structure is less intense, there is a) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (need for strong leadership and commitment, which is dependent largely on volunteerism; the) Tj T* -0.0044 Tc 0.0228 Tw (governance structure requires it to be effective. It also requires a common understanding) Tj T* -0.0029 Tc 0.0138 Tw (among presidents, trustees, and the Commission members on issues related to restructuring) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0039 Tw (and the vision for higher education.) Tj 36 -20.16 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.024 Tc 0 Tw (R) Tj 8.64 0 TD /F3 9.48 Tf 0.0085 Tc (ECOMMENDATION) Tj 89.64 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.036 Tc (:) Tj 3.96 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj 6 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0012 Tc -0.0012 Tw (In light of this five-year juncture of the new structure, the) Tj -108.24 -13.92 TD 0.0018 Tc -0.0018 Tw (reassessment of the structure\222s effectiveness, the addition of several new) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0023 Tc -0.0241 Tw (institutional presidents, and the advent of a new executive director of the) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (Commission, the higher education community should reenergize and recommit to) Tj 0 -13.92 TD -0.0036 Tc 0.0276 Tw (making the most of this governance structure, recognizing its yet untapped) Tj 0 -14.16 TD 0.0024 Tc 0 Tw (potential.) Tj ET endstream endobj 45 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 46 0 obj<>stream BT 72 38.52 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.004 Tc 0.026 Tw (Appendix One) Tj 405 0 TD 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (1) Tj -229.8 670.44 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.016 Tc -0.016 Tw (Appendix 1) Tj -104.04 -15.72 TD /F3 14.04 Tf -0.0099 Tc -0.0441 Tw (Detailed Results of the Restructuring Survey) Tj -93.12 -30 TD /F5 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (\(The survey instrument, with the distributions of responses to each individual item, follows\)) Tj 131.64 -25.56 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.009 Tc -0.039 Tw (The Overall Distribution of Opinions) Tj ET 203.64 635.16 190.08 1.2 re f BT 72 624.12 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0105 Tc 0 Tw (Specific) Tj 39.24 0 TD 0 Tc ( ) Tj 3 0 TD 0.0075 Tc (opinions) Tj ET 72 622.2 39.12 0.6 re f BT 155.64 624.12 TD -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (. Of the 13 objectives of the restructuring act, a majority of respondents rate) Tj ET 114.24 622.2 41.28 0.6 re f BT 72 610.32 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0113 Tw (the attainment of six as excellent or good. These positive responses are led by those referring) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0045 Tc 0.0245 Tw (to student access to higher education or to institutional flexibility in establishing new) Tj T* -0.0042 Tc 0.0142 Tw (academic programs. In the remaining seven cases there is no consensus between) Tj T* -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (excellent/good and only fair/poor. The mixed pattern is in part due to high percentages of) Tj T* -0.0056 Tc 0.0296 Tw (respondents expressing no opinion; these percentages range from 11% on systemwide) Tj T* -0.0035 Tc 0.0168 Tw (coordination of higher education to 53% on institutional legal representation.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (On the nine responsibilities of the Commission/Presidents' Council/trustees, there is a) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (moderate tendency for ratings of these entities to move in a roughly parallel fashion. All of) Tj T* -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (the entities are perceived as doing well on timeliness in addressing issues and timeliness in) Tj T* -0.0037 Tc 0.0122 Tw (making decisions, though there are more respondents with no opinion in the case of the) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (trustees. Both the Commission and the Presidents' Council do fairly well on cooperation) Tj T* -0.0054 Tc 0.0254 Tw (among the various higher education entities and on availability of information on higher) Tj T* -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (education. None of the entities does particularly well on K-12/higher education) Tj T* -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (communication and collaboration, the budget development process, progress toward statewide) Tj T* 0 Tc -0 Tw (master planning, coordinated systemwide advocacy, or resource sharing among institutions.) Tj T* -0.0038 Tc 0.0223 Tw (However, for all entities, moderate to large numbers of respondents have no opinion with) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0.0036 Tw (regard to these issues.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.0111 Tw (In responding to the questions regarding the 13 objectives of the act, many left them blank;) Tj 0 -13.8 TD 0.0009 Tc -0.0009 Tw (the numbers range from 17 to 76. Similarly, on the nine responsibilities of the Commission,) Tj T* -0.0046 Tc 0.0246 Tw (there are numerous blank responses \(37-60\). On the responsibilities of the Presidents') Tj T* -0.0051 Tc 0.0223 Tw (Council, blanks range from 44 to 63. Finally, for trustees, the number of ) Tj 352.56 0 TD 0.0043 Tc -0.0043 Tw (nonresponses is) Tj -352.56 -13.8 TD -0.0147 Tc 0.0747 Tw (even higher \(59-72\).) Tj 56.04 -28.08 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0017 Tc -0.0017 Tw (The Perceived Role of Restructuring by Assessments of Conditions) Tj ET 128.04 262.32 341.28 1.2 re f BT 72 241.32 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0025 Tc 0.0125 Tw (There is no simple relationship between respondents' positive or negative ratings on specific) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (issues and their inclination \(or lack thereof\) to attribute the perceived current situation to) Tj T* -0.005 Tc 0.0221 Tw (restructuring. The difficulty of generalizing here is partly attributable to the large numbers of) Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (respondents who do not express an opinion on the role of restructuring.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0124 Tw (The most common pattern, characterizing seven of the 13 objectives of the Restructuring Act,) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0071 Tc 0.0398 Tw (is for the "extreme" ratings\227"excellent" or "poor"\227to be associated with a greater) Tj T* -0.0045 Tc 0.0205 Tw (inclination to credit or blame restructuring. This pattern emerges for the areas of access and) Tj T* -0.0049 Tc 0.0392 Tw (affordability, institutional accountability, and coordination/review of academic programming,) Tj T* -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (among others. With regard to institutional program flexibility, there is a positive relationship) Tj T* -0.0168 Tc 0.0768 Tw (between the ) Tj 60.6 0 TD -0.0062 Tc 0.0362 Tw (favorability of the rating and the likelihood of viewing restructuring as the cause.) Tj -60.6 -13.8 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0118 Tw (In the case of student aid administration and trustee appointment, a negative relationship) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0059 Tc 0.0386 Tw (occurs: undesirable conditions are seen as having occurred because of restructuring, and) Tj ET endstream endobj 47 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 48 0 obj<>stream BT 72 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.004 Tc 0.026 Tw (Appendix One) Tj 405 0 TD 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj -426.96 659.16 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.004 Tc 0.0225 Tw (desirable conditions are seen as having occurred despite restructuring. In three instances there) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.004 Tc 0.004 Tw (is no pattern.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0055 Tc 0.0239 Tw (As far as the Commission's performance is concerned, in five instances the extreme ratings) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.0131 Tw (are associated with a greater tendency to cite restructuring; these include cooperation among) Tj T* -0.0027 Tc 0.0136 Tw (the entities, budget development, availability of information, and systemwide advocacy. On) Tj T* -0.0043 Tc 0.0228 Tw (four responsibilities there is no pattern linking ratings and restructuring. On the Presidents') Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (Council's performance, in five instances extreme positions are linked with a higher probability) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (of attributing the perceived current situation to restructuring; these include timeliness in) Tj T* -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (addressing issues, timeliness in making decisions, cooperation among the entities, and) Tj T* -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (availability of information. No pattern is evident on four responsibilities. Finally, regarding) Tj T* -0.0094 Tc 0.0523 Tw (trustees, there are five instances in which the extreme ratings are associated with a greater) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (tendency to cite restructuring; these include timeliness in addressing issues, budget) Tj T* -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (development, and availability of information. On four responsibilities there is no pattern.) Tj 177.84 -41.64 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0015 Tc -0.0615 Tw (Opinions by Sector) Tj ET 249.84 485.64 97.8 1.2 re f BT 72 474.6 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0326 Tc 0 Tw (Summary) Tj ET 72 472.68 46.32 0.6 re f BT 72 460.8 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0158 Tw (Proportionally more respondents in the community college sector and the state) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0127 Tw (college/university sector believe that the restructuring act has been a positive change than in) Tj T* -0.0026 Tc 0.0026 Tw (the public research university sector or the independent sector.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0248 Tw (The Community Colleges and the State Colleges/Universities) Tj ET 72 403.68 295.08 0.6 re f BT 72 391.8 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.0253 Tw (A majority of respondents in the community and state college/university sectors believe that) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0051 Tc 0.0211 Tw (there has been a great deal or some improvement in innovation and creativity in dealing with) Tj T* -0.0098 Tc 0.0698 Tw (higher education issues. Both "a great deal" and "some" receive considerable endorsement.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0052 Tc 0.0395 Tw (The Public Research Universities and the Independent Colleges/Universities) Tj ET 72 334.68 366.72 0.6 re f BT 72 322.8 TD -0.0044 Tc 0.0244 Tw (A majority of respondents in the public research university and independent sectors believe) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.004 Tc 0.0132 Tw (that there has been "some" improvement in innovation and creativity, but none believe there) Tj T* -0.0081 Tc 0.0334 Tw (has been "a great deal" of change. In all four sectors a majority believe that there has been a) Tj T* -0.0037 Tc 0.0129 Tw (great deal or some improvement in institutional decision making. A majority of positive) Tj T* -0.0076 Tc 0.0445 Tw (responses in the community college and state college/university sectors are "a great deal," and) Tj T* -0.0059 Tc 0.0299 Tw (a majority in the public university and independent sectors are "some.") Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0083 Tc 0.0083 Tw (Other Patterns) Tj ET 72 224.28 68.76 0.6 re f BT 72 212.4 TD -0.0044 Tc 0.0204 Tw (Opinions by sector do not always break down as described above. Other patterns appear as) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (well; therefore there does not seem to be a pervasive polarization of opinions. All three) Tj T* 0 Tc -0 Tw (public sectors are positive regarding improvement in the accountability of institutions and) Tj T* -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (their boards of trustees; in contrast, the independent colleges and universities are not) Tj T* -0.0032 Tc 0.0118 Tw (particularly positive about improvement in this area. The community colleges are by far the) Tj T* -0.0011 Tc 0.0011 Tw (most positive sector with respect to resources to support policy recommendations. The) Tj T* -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (community colleges, public research universities, and independent colleges and universities) Tj T* -0.0013 Tc 0.0133 Tw (are positive about coordination and collaboration among higher education institutions, while) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0139 Tw (the state college/university respondents are divided on this issue. Finally, the community) Tj T* -0.0035 Tc 0.0144 Tw (colleges and public research universities are positive about fair and equitable systemwide) Tj ET endstream endobj 49 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 50 0 obj<>stream BT 72 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.004 Tc 0.026 Tw (Appendix One) Tj 405 0 TD 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj -426.96 659.16 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw (policy development and decision making, while the other sectors are considerably less so.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (With respect to collaboration and communication between the Commission and the) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0142 Tw (Presidents' Council, the community colleges are somewhat more positive than the other) Tj T* -0.0105 Tc 0 Tw (sectors.) Tj 127.56 -27.84 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0031 Tc -0.0031 Tw (Opinions by Organizational Affiliation) Tj ET 199.56 623.64 198.36 1.2 re f BT 72 612.6 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0326 Tc 0 Tw (Summary) Tj ET 72 610.68 46.32 0.6 re f BT 72 598.8 TD -0.0072 Tc 0.0329 Tw (On the most general item concerning the restructuring act, all of the groups except for) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.0217 Tw (financial aid have a majority or near-majority who regard the act as a positive change.) Tj T* -0.0069 Tc 0.0309 Tw (Financial aid is also the only group with a non-trivial percentage who have no opinion \(12%\).) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (State officials are the most positive.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD 0.0027 Tc 0 Tw (Consensus) Tj ET 72 527.88 51.24 0.6 re f BT 72 516 TD -0.0051 Tc 0.0201 Tw (A majority of those in each group believe that the implementation of the act has brought about) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.012 Tw (some or a great deal of improvement in innovation and creativity in dealing with higher) Tj T* -0.0027 Tc 0.0027 Tw (education issues, and also in institutional decision making.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (Several items elicit positive responses from every group except the financial aid community,) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (which is also the group that exhibits the greatest tendency to have no opinion. On other) Tj T* -0.0048 Tc 0.0219 Tw (issues, the financial aid community is one of two groups to have a negative opinion.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (Because of the financial aid community members' strong representation among the) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0124 Tw (respondents, as well as their higher than average tendency to have no opinion, this group) Tj T* -0.0022 Tc 0.0097 Tw (tends to account for a considerable share of all respondents with no opinion. For example, on) Tj T* -0.0053 Tc 0.0238 Tw (a range of questionnaire items, financial aid accounts for roughly 35%-50% of the "no) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0 Tw (opinions.") Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0028 Tc 0.0108 Tw (When the financial aid community is divided into two subsets, EOF and other, there is a) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0034 Tc 0.0105 Tw (tendency for the non-EOF portion to be more likely to have no opinion. There is also a) Tj T* -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (tendency for the EOF portion to be more likely to have only slightly positive\227or mildly) Tj T* -0.003 Tc 0.0122 Tw (negative\227opinions. There are a few exceptions, however. For example, EOF is more) Tj T* -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (positive than the other subgroup about resources.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.006 Tc 0.006 Tw (State officials) Tj 66.24 0 TD -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (. Non-Commission state officials are the most positive about restructuring on) Tj ET 72 238.08 66.12 0.6 re f BT 72 226.2 TD -0.007 Tc 0.0259 Tw (the issue that is phrased in the broadest terms. They also have a majority who see some or a) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (great deal of improvement in resources to support policy recommendations.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD 0.0049 Tc -0.1249 Tw (Commission members) Tj 107.64 0 TD -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (. On the resource issue, Commission members are the least likely to) Tj ET 72 182.88 107.52 0.6 re f BT 72 171 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0109 Tw (see some or a great deal of improvement. All groups except for the Commission members) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0052 Tc 0.027 Tw (and financial aid have a positive view regarding improvement in coordination and) Tj T* -0.0021 Tc 0.0321 Tw (collaboration among higher education institutions.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD 0.0017 Tc -0.0092 Tw (Commission members do tend to be positive on most issues; but they are not the most positive) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (of all the groups. A majority of Commission members view restructuring as a positive) Tj T* -0.0046 Tc 0.0313 Tw (change, and rate collaboration/communication between the Commission and the Presidents') Tj ET endstream endobj 51 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 52 0 obj<>stream BT 72 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.004 Tc 0.026 Tw (Appendix One) Tj 405 0 TD 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (4) Tj -426.96 659.16 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0044 Tc 0.0194 Tw (Council as excellent or good. Also, a majority see a great deal or some improvement in) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (innovation/creativity, institutional decision making, institutional accountability, and equitable) Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (systemwide policies/decisions.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (The Presidents' Council) Tj 114.12 0 TD -0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw (. Members of the Presidents' Council are neither the most positive nor) Tj ET 72 652.08 114 0.6 re f BT 72 640.2 TD -0.0043 Tc 0.0129 Tw (the most negative group on any issue. Exactly half of the Council members regard) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0065 Tc 0.0425 Tw (restructuring as a positive change. Slightly over half rate collaboration/communication) Tj T* -0.0032 Tc 0.0132 Tw (between the Commission and the Presidents' Council as excellent or good. Overwhelming) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0189 Tw (majorities of presidents rate innovation/creativity and coordination/ collaboration among) Tj T* -0.0008 Tc 0.01 Tw (institutions as having improved a great deal or some. Improvement in institutional decision) Tj T* -0.0022 Tc 0.0131 Tw (making, and institutional accountability also receive a solid majority the Presidents' Council) Tj T* -0.0032 Tc 0.0141 Tw (support. The Council shares the Commission's restrained support for improvement in) Tj T* -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (equitable systemwide policies/decisions, as well as its negative view of resources \(though the) Tj T* -0.0039 Tc 0.0039 Tw (Council is somewhat less negative\).) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0058 Tc 0.0058 Tw (Other institutional employees) Tj 141.84 0 TD -0.0035 Tc 0.0302 Tw (. The views of non-presidential employees parallel very closely) Tj ET 72 500.28 141.72 0.6 re f BT 72 488.4 TD -0.0063 Tc 0.0063 Tw (those of their presidents.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.012 Tc 0 Tw (Trustees) Tj 40.56 0 TD -0.0078 Tc 0.036 Tw (. All groups except for financial aid and trustees have a majority who see some or a) Tj ET 72 458.88 40.44 0.6 re f BT 72 447 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.0271 Tw (great deal of improvement regarding equitable systemwide policies/decisions. In most other) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0104 Tw (respects the opinions of trustees do not stand out in either a positive or a negative direction.) Tj T* -0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw (An exception is the issue of institutional decision making, where trustees are the most positive) Tj T* -0.0037 Tc 0.0208 Tw (group. As a general rule, the trustees' opinions follow those of the Presidents' Council) Tj T* -0 Tc 0 Tw (somewhat more closely than they do those of the Commission; however, these two options) Tj T* -0.0031 Tc 0.0031 Tw (often do not diverge substantially.) Tj ET endstream endobj 53 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 54 0 obj<>stream BT 93.6 38.52 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0165 Tc 0.0135 Tw (Appendix Two) Tj 405 0 TD 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (1) Tj -249.12 668.52 TD /F3 14.04 Tf -0.0021 Tc -0.0279 Tw (Appendix 2) Tj -91.32 -22.08 TD -0.0115 Tc -0.0185 Tw (ӣƵ\222s Vision for Higher Education) Tj -36.12 -106.44 TD /F8 12 Tf 0.0041 Tc -0.0161 Tw (ӣƵ\222s system of higher education aspires to be among the) Tj ET 102.84 619.8 1.44 8.76 re f 102.84 627.12 8.76 1.44 re f 105.72 619.8 3 5.88 re f 105.72 622.68 5.88 3 re f 110.16 619.8 1.44 1.44 re f 110.16 619.8 1.44 1.44 re f 111.6 627.12 377.76 1.44 re f 111.6 622.68 377.76 3 re f 111.6 619.8 377.76 1.44 re f 496.68 619.8 1.44 8.76 re f 489.36 627.12 8.76 1.44 re f 492.24 619.8 3 5.88 re f 489.36 622.68 5.88 3 re f 489.36 619.8 1.44 1.44 re f 489.36 619.8 1.44 1.44 re f 102.84 575.76 1.44 44.04 re f 105.72 575.76 3 44.04 re f 110.16 575.76 1.44 44.04 re f 489.36 575.76 1.44 44.04 re f 492.24 575.76 3 44.04 re f 496.68 575.76 1.44 44.04 re f BT 144 564.72 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (best in the world, embracing excellence, access, and affordability.) Tj ET 102.84 561.96 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 561.96 3 13.8 re f 110.16 561.96 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 561.96 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 561.96 3 13.8 re f 496.68 561.96 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 550.92 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (The quality of the state\222s public and independent colleges and) Tj ET 102.84 548.16 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 548.16 3 13.8 re f 110.16 548.16 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 548.16 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 548.16 3 13.8 re f 496.68 548.16 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 537.12 TD 0.0018 Tc -0.0018 Tw (universities will serve as a magnet to attract both resident and) Tj ET 102.84 534.36 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 534.36 3 13.8 re f 110.16 534.36 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 534.36 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 534.36 3 13.8 re f 496.68 534.36 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 523.32 TD 0.0036 Tc -0.0207 Tw (nonresident students and highly qualified faculty. Institutions) Tj ET 102.84 520.56 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 520.56 3 13.8 re f 110.16 520.56 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 520.56 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 520.56 3 13.8 re f 496.68 520.56 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 509.52 TD 0.0027 Tc -0.0177 Tw (will model tolerance and civility, celebrating the diversity that) Tj ET 102.84 506.76 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 506.76 3 13.8 re f 110.16 506.76 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 506.76 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 506.76 3 13.8 re f 496.68 506.76 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 495.72 TD 0.0026 Tc -0.016 Tw (creates rich learning environments. A major force in developing) Tj ET 102.84 492.96 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 492.96 3 13.8 re f 110.16 492.96 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 492.96 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 492.96 3 13.8 re f 496.68 492.96 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 481.92 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (the full potential of ӣƵ and its people, higher education) Tj ET 102.84 479.16 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 479.16 3 13.8 re f 110.16 479.16 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 479.16 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 479.16 3 13.8 re f 496.68 479.16 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 468.12 TD 0.0043 Tc -0.0163 Tw (will serve all residents who have the interest and potential to) Tj ET 102.84 465.36 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 465.36 3 13.8 re f 110.16 465.36 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 465.36 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 465.36 3 13.8 re f 496.68 465.36 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 454.32 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (learn, regardless of their economic circumstances.) Tj ET 102.84 439.56 1.44 25.8 re f 105.72 439.56 3 25.8 re f 110.16 439.56 1.44 25.8 re f 489.36 439.56 1.44 25.8 re f 492.24 439.56 3 25.8 re f 496.68 439.56 1.44 25.8 re f BT 144 425.52 TD 0.0009 Tc -0.0009 Tw (The state\222s higher education system will develop and nurture the) Tj ET 102.84 422.76 1.44 16.8 re f 105.72 422.76 3 16.8 re f 110.16 422.76 1.44 16.8 re f 489.36 422.76 1.44 16.8 re f 492.24 422.76 3 16.8 re f 496.68 422.76 1.44 16.8 re f BT 144 411.72 TD 0.0027 Tc -0.0027 Tw (citizens and leaders of the future, preparing individuals for) Tj ET 102.84 408.96 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 408.96 3 13.8 re f 110.16 408.96 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 408.96 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 408.96 3 13.8 re f 496.68 408.96 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 398.04 TD 0.0029 Tc -0.0029 Tw (fulfilling lives, rewarding careers, and lifelong learning.) Tj ET 102.84 395.28 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 395.28 3 13.8 re f 110.16 395.28 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 395.28 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 395.28 3 13.8 re f 496.68 395.28 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 384.24 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Technology will strengthen the system and improve access,) Tj ET 102.84 381.48 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 381.48 3 13.8 re f 110.16 381.48 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 381.48 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 381.48 3 13.8 re f 496.68 381.48 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 370.44 TD 0.0013 Tc -0.0013 Tw (efficiency, and program effectiveness into the 21st century and) Tj ET 102.84 367.68 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 367.68 3 13.8 re f 110.16 367.68 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 367.68 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 367.68 3 13.8 re f 496.68 367.68 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 356.64 TD -0.0008 Tc 0.0008 Tw (beyond. Through teaching, research, and public service, colleges) Tj ET 102.84 353.88 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 353.88 3 13.8 re f 110.16 353.88 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 353.88 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 353.88 3 13.8 re f 496.68 353.88 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 342.84 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (and universities will support the state\222s public policy goals of) Tj ET 102.84 340.08 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 340.08 3 13.8 re f 110.16 340.08 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 340.08 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 340.08 3 13.8 re f 496.68 340.08 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 329.04 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (economic growth, social stability, and enhanced quality of life.) Tj ET 102.84 326.28 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 326.28 3 13.8 re f 110.16 326.28 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 326.28 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 326.28 3 13.8 re f 496.68 326.28 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 315.24 TD 0.0047 Tc -0.018 Tw (ӣƵ will value and support its investment in higher) Tj ET 102.84 312.48 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 312.48 3 13.8 re f 110.16 312.48 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 312.48 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 312.48 3 13.8 re f 496.68 312.48 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 301.44 TD 0.0011 Tc -0.0211 Tw (education, and institutions will seek innovative, collaborative) Tj ET 102.84 298.68 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 298.68 3 13.8 re f 110.16 298.68 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 298.68 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 298.68 3 13.8 re f 496.68 298.68 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 287.64 TD 0.0029 Tc -0.0029 Tw (approaches to meet the challenges ahead, committed to serving a) Tj ET 102.84 284.88 1.44 13.8 re f 105.72 284.88 3 13.8 re f 110.16 284.88 1.44 13.8 re f 489.36 284.88 1.44 13.8 re f 492.24 284.88 3 13.8 re f 496.68 284.88 1.44 13.8 re f BT 144 273.36 TD -0.0049 Tc 0.0049 Tw (globally competitive society.) Tj ET 102.84 231 1.44 8.76 re f 102.84 231 8.76 1.44 re f 105.72 233.88 3 5.88 re f 105.72 233.88 5.88 3 re f 110.16 238.32 1.44 1.44 re f 110.16 238.32 1.44 1.44 re f 111.6 238.32 377.76 1.44 re f 111.6 233.88 377.76 3 re f 111.6 231 377.76 1.44 re f 496.68 231 1.44 8.76 re f 489.36 231 8.76 1.44 re f 492.24 233.88 3 5.88 re f 489.36 233.88 5.88 3 re f 489.36 238.32 1.44 1.44 re f 489.36 238.32 1.44 1.44 re f 102.84 239.76 1.44 45 re f 105.72 239.76 3 45 re f 110.16 239.76 1.44 45 re f 489.36 239.76 1.44 45 re f 492.24 239.76 3 45 re f 496.68 239.76 1.44 45 re f endstream endobj 55 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 56 0 obj<>stream BT 86.4 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (1) Tj 344.76 0 TD 0.0193 Tc 0.0107 Tw (Appendix Three) Tj -187.56 636.84 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.016 Tc -0.016 Tw (Appendix 3) Tj -97.2 -21.72 TD /F3 14.04 Tf -0.0031 Tc 0 Tw (H) Tj 10.92 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0175 Tc 0.0175 Tw (IGHER ) Tj 39.48 0 TD /F3 14.04 Tf -0.0047 Tc 0 Tw (E) Tj 9.36 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0277 Tc 0.0277 Tw (DUCATION ) Tj 62.64 0 TD /F3 14.04 Tf -0.0569 Tc 0 Tw (R) Tj 10.08 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0415 Tc 0.0415 Tw (ESTRUCTURING ) Tj 91.2 0 TD /F3 14.04 Tf -0.0569 Tc 0 Tw (A) Tj 10.08 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0473 Tc (CT) Tj 15.24 0 TD /F3 14.04 Tf 0.0047 Tc (:) Tj -272.28 -16.08 TD -0.0062 Tc (S) Tj 7.8 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0042 Tc -0.0758 Tw (UMMARY OF MAJOR ) Tj 116.52 0 TD /F3 14.04 Tf 0.0584 Tc 0 Tw (I) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0403 Tc 0.0403 Tw (MPLEMENTATION ) Tj 103.44 0 TD /F3 14.04 Tf -0.0569 Tc 0 Tw (A) Tj 10.08 0 TD /F3 11.04 Tf -0.0194 Tc (CTIVITIES) Tj -320.04 -25.8 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0011 Tc -0.0011 Tw (The restructuring act required four major studies within the first year and an) Tj 0 -14.16 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.0031 Tw (interim assessment of restructuring after two years.) Tj 18 -23.16 TD 0 Tc 0 Tw (1.) Tj 9 0 TD /F0 12 Tf 5.664 Tw ( ) Tj 9 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0045 Tc 0.0345 Tw (K-12/higher education collaboration report -) Tj 228.6 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.003 Tc 0.003 Tw ( adopted in April 1995, described) Tj -228.6 -13.08 TD -0.0051 Tc 0.0351 Tw (existing school/college collaboration and established a framework for interagency) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (collaboration on jointly defined issues.) Tj 0 -23.16 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.008 Tc 0.008 Tw (A joint county ) Tj 72.24 0 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0232 Tw (vo-tech/community college collaboration report led to alliances) Tj -72.24 -12.84 TD -0.0124 Tc 0.0524 Tw (between the two entities in each county.) Tj -18 -23.16 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0043 Tc 0.0283 Tw (An interagency Task Force on Improving Transition from High School to) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.0073 Tc 0.0073 Tw (College is underway.) Tj -18 -23.16 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0043 Tc 0.0152 Tw (Commission staff is working with the Department of Education to develop new) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (regulations for teacher education programs and certification.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (Commission staff attends State Board of Education meetings.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (A representative from the State Board of Education attends Commission) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0147 Tc 0 Tw (meetings.) Tj -36 -23.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0 Tc (2.) Tj 9 0 TD /F0 12 Tf 5.664 Tw ( ) Tj 9 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (Student aid administration report -) Tj 180.6 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.0013 Tc -0.0013 Tw ( adopted in June 1995, recommended various) Tj -180.6 -12.96 TD -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (ways to improve student aid services and operations.) Tj 0 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (Most recommended efficiencies to improve service to students and institutions) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0048 Tw (have been implemented.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.005 Tc 0.02 Tw (Recently enacted legislation implements the recommended jointure of the) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.0179 Tw (Student Assistance Board and the Higher Education Assistance Authority and) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (provides more flexibility for the Office of Student Assistance \(OSA\) in) Tj T* -0.0112 Tc 0.0712 Tw (contracting for goods and services.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0048 Tc 0.0198 Tw (The Educational Opportunity Fund \(EOF\) program converted to completely) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.0353 Tw (electronic processing of student grants.) Tj -36 -23.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (3.) Tj 9 0 TD /F0 12 Tf 5.664 Tw ( ) Tj 9 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (Funding and tuition report -) Tj 145.32 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw ( adopted in October 1995, set forth long-term) Tj -145.32 -12.96 TD -0.0036 Tc 0.0186 Tw (recommendations for funding both public and independent colleges and) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0009 Tc 0 Tw (universities.) Tj 0 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0026 Tc 0.0026 Tw (Annual budget policy statements are based on the recommendations of the) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (joint Commission/Presidents\222 Council report.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0071 Tc 0.0271 Tw (Governor pledged and is funding $48 million over four years to move the) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.0027 Tc 0.0027 Tw (community colleges toward the recommended partnership of 1/3 from state) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0029 Tw (operating aid and 2/3 from counties and students.) Tj ET endstream endobj 57 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 58 0 obj<>stream BT 86.4 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (2) Tj 344.76 0 TD 0.0193 Tc 0.0107 Tw (Appendix Three) Tj -348.72 659.52 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0029 Tc 0.0029 Tw (Some progress has been made in moving funding to the recommended) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0064 Tc 0.0464 Tw (partnership level for independent colleges and universities.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (Additional funding to balance partnership for senior public institutions has not) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0076 Tc 0.0076 Tw (yet been implemented.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0031 Tc 0.0031 Tw (A $60 million increase in the state bonding limit for facilities at community) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0101 Tc 0.0701 Tw (colleges was enacted.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0035 Tc 0.0155 Tw (Governor proposed increased funding for facilities renewal at senior public and) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0034 Tc 0.0034 Tw (independent colleges and universities.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (The dollar value of TAG awards has increased by $21.75 million.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw (EOF received additional funding of $1 million for student grants and $385,000) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0055 Tc 0.0295 Tw (for summer and academic program support.) Tj -36 -23.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (4.) Tj 9 0 TD /F0 12 Tf 5.664 Tw ( ) Tj 9 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0058 Tc 0.0058 Tw (Collective bargaining report -) Tj 152.16 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0047 Tc 0.0347 Tw ( adopted in May 1995, recommended a means of) Tj -152.16 -12.96 TD 0.0008 Tc -0.0128 Tw (improving the level of institutional input into state college collective negotiations) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.0057 Tc 0.0385 Tw (and oversight for civil service employees of the colleges. While individual) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (campuses continue to work on these issues, no state-level action has been taken.) Tj -18 -29.16 TD /F3 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (5.) Tj 9 0 TD /F0 12 Tf 5.664 Tw ( ) Tj 9 0 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0034 Tc 0.0034 Tw (Interim assessment of restructuring report -) Tj 225.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0013 Tc 0.0253 Tw ( adopted in June 1996, indicated) Tj -225.48 -12.96 TD -0.0034 Tc 0.0143 Tw (that positive views of the new structure outweighed negative and that significant) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0048 Tw (progress had been made in implementing the law.) Tj -36 -23.64 TD /F3 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (The restructuring act required the development of a master plan. In October 1996,) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0021 Tc -0.013 Tw (the Commission adopted the first statewide plan for higher education since 1981.) Tj 0 -14.16 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.0026 Tw (The following recommendations have been implemented:) Tj 18 -23.16 TD 0.0046 Tc -0.0046 Tw (Flexibility and productivity study) Tj 171.84 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0073 Tc 0.0073 Tw ( to address cumbersome regulations and statutes) Tj -171.84 -12.96 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0048 Tw (was adopted in November 1997.) Tj 18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (Efforts have been made to address issues in several identified areas; some) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0059 Tc 0.023 Tw (efforts have been completed and some are underway.) Tj -36 -23.04 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (A capacity study) Tj 85.32 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw ( was conducted and the Commission adopted recommendations) Tj -85.32 -12.96 TD -0.0056 Tc 0.0296 Tw (regarding the capacity of ӣƵ higher education in March 1998.) Tj 18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (The primary finding is that there is no need to establish, close, or consolidate) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (any institutions; institutional collaboration and competitive instructional) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (models, such as distance learning, should be used to address pockets of unmet) Tj T* -0.0046 Tc 0.0155 Tw (need. \(Two efforts are underway. The Rutgers/Brookdale initiative to offer) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (upper division programs in western Monmouth County and the joint Atlantic) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0036 Tc 0.017 Tw (Cape Community College will improve access to higher education in) Tj T* -0.0093 Tc 0.0093 Tw (underserved areas.\)) Tj -36 -23.04 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (A report on improvement of graduation/transfer rates for low-income or) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.006 Tc 0.006 Tw (minority students ) Tj 93.24 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (was adopted in April 1997.) Tj -75.24 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0024 Tc 0.0024 Tw ($1 million was included in the FY 1999 state budget; 10 institutions received) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0064 Tc 0.0282 Tw (one-time, seed grants for model projects to improve the graduation and transfer) Tj ET endstream endobj 59 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 60 0 obj<>stream BT 86.4 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (3) Tj 344.76 0 TD 0.0193 Tc 0.0107 Tw (Appendix Three) Tj -330.72 659.52 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0013 Tc 0.0013 Tw (rates of minority or low-income students.) Tj -36 -23.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (A report on incentive funding to promote urban revitalization) Tj 316.68 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0171 Tc 0.0471 Tw ( in ӣƵ was) Tj -316.68 -12.96 TD -0.0049 Tc 0.0049 Tw (adopted in May 1997.) Tj 18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0047 Tc 0.0156 Tw ($400,000 was included in FY 1999 state budget for planning grants, which) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0032 Tc 0.0152 Tw (were awarded to 13 college- or university-led collaboratives in the eight) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (designated locales. The Commission\222s FY 2000 budget policy statement) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (recommends $8 million for implementation grants.) Tj -36 -23.16 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0018 Tc -0.0018 Tw (A report on higher education technology) Tj 207.72 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.006 Tc 0.006 Tw ( included recommendations regarding) Tj -207.72 -12.96 TD -0.0058 Tc 0.0298 Tw (higher education technology and distance learning; the report was adopted in) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.006 Tc 0.006 Tw (September 1997.) Tj 18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0081 Tc 0.0481 Tw (A $50 million Higher Education Technology Infrastructure Bond Fund was) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0028 Tc 0.0028 Tw (created to help institutions accelerate implementation of their long-range plans.) Tj -18 -23.04 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0064 Tc 0.0514 Tw (The Virtual Academic Library Environment \(VALE\) was established with) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0288 Tw ($500,000 from the infrastructure bond fund. VALE allows academic libraries) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.0023 Tc 0.0173 Tw (statewide to collaborate, leveraging buying power for database acquisitions) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.006 Tc 0.006 Tw (and information resources.) Tj -18 -23.16 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (A Technology Advisory Committee is overseeing establishment of a statewide) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0045 Tc 0.0195 Tw (telecommunications network backbone that will provide 45 ӣƵ) Tj T* -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (colleges and universities with universal access to advanced digital) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (communications. The infrastructure fund will provide $4.5 million in start-up) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (moneys to be matched by institutional funds.) Tj -18 -23.16 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0059 Tc 0.0277 Tw (With support from the Governor\222s office, a ӣƵ Virtual University, an) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (initial on-line index of distance learning offerings, became operable in January) Tj T* -0.0077 Tc 0.0477 Tw (1999. The Governor proposed $500,000 for faculty development and) Tj T* -0.0036 Tc 0.0036 Tw (additional course conversion.) Tj -36 -23.04 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (A joint Commission/State Employment and Training Commission literacy report) Tj 0 -13.08 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0059 Tc 0.0231 Tw (on the need for and current availability of adult literacy services in ӣƵ was) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.012 Tc 0.052 Tw (adopted In March 1998.) Tj 18 -23.16 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 27.144 Tw ( ) Tj 30.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0034 Tc 0.0167 Tw (Legislation to establish the recommended State Council for Adult Literacy) Tj -18 -12.84 TD -0.0042 Tc 0.0042 Tw (Education Services was enacted in May 1999.) Tj -36 -29.16 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0066 Tc -0.0466 Tw (The Educational Opportunity Fund) Tj 183.12 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0036 Tc 0.0036 Tw ( Board adopted a five-year strategic plan in) Tj -183.12 -12.84 TD -0.011 Tc 0.011 Tw (October 1997.) Tj 0 -23.76 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0044 Tc -0.0044 Tw (An update of the long-range plan ) Tj 172.8 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (is currently underway. The Commission is) Tj -172.8 -14.04 TD -0.0008 Tc 0.0008 Tw (expected to adopt additional recommendations to help ӣƵ achieve its vision) Tj 0 -14.16 TD -0.0043 Tc 0.0043 Tw (for higher education in May 1999.) Tj ET endstream endobj 61 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 62 0 obj<>stream BT 86.4 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (4) Tj 344.76 0 TD 0.0193 Tc 0.0107 Tw (Appendix Three) Tj -384.72 658.92 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0029 Tc -0.0029 Tw (Licensure and related approvals by Commission on Higher Education) Tj 18 -19.56 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0173 Tc 0 Tw (Licensure) Tj ET 86.4 687.48 47.04 0.6 re f BT 86.4 674.64 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0042 Tc 0.0042 Tw (Three out-of-state institutions were licensed to offer courses in ӣƵ) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0049 Tc 0.0349 Tw (\(Asbury Theological Seminary, LaSalle University, and St. John\222s University\)) Tj -18 -14.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.004 Tc 0.004 Tw (Seven ӣƵ institutions were ) Tj 173.52 0 TD -0.0048 Tc 0 Tw (relicensed) Tj -173.52 -13.68 TD -0.0288 Tc 0.0288 Tw (\(Beth ) Tj 29.52 0 TD 0.0017 Tc -0.0017 Tw (Medrash ) Tj 45 0 TD 0.0008 Tc -0.0008 Tw (Govoha, DeVry Institute, Katharine ) Tj 178.32 0 TD -0.0058 Tc 0.0658 Tw (Gibbs School-Montclair, New) Tj -252.84 -13.8 TD -0.0023 Tc 0.0023 Tw (Brunswick Theological Seminary, Rabbi Jacob Joseph School, Rabbinical College) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0092 Tc 0.0092 Tw (of America, and ) Tj 80.52 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (Talmudical Academy\)) Tj -98.52 -14.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0046 Tc 0.0046 Tw (Two out-of-state institutions were ) Tj 165.84 0 TD 0.0072 Tc 0 Tw (relicensed) Tj -165.84 -13.68 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (\(Philadelphia College of Bible \226 degree program and Syracuse University \226) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.0225 Tw (courses for college credit in selected high schools\)) Tj -18 -19.8 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (University designation) Tj ET 86.4 540.96 108.84 0.6 re f BT 86.4 528 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0049 Tc 0.0289 Tw (Five colleges were granted university designation) Tj 0 -13.2 TD -0.0025 Tc 0.0175 Tw (\(Jersey City State, Kean, Monmouth, Rowan, and William Paterson\).) Tj -18 -23.4 TD -0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw (Changing/exceeding programmatic mission) Tj ET 86.4 489.48 209.16 0.6 re f BT 86.4 476.64 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0 Tc 0 Tw (One institution was approved for change of mission) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0076 Tc 0.0276 Tw (\(The Richard Stockton College of ӣƵ\)) Tj -18 -14.88 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (11 programs that exceed institutional mission were approved) Tj 0 -13.32 TD -0.036 Tc 0 Tw (\() Tj 3.96 0 TD -0.0042 Tc 0.0042 Tw (M.S.N., Felician College; ) Tj 126.24 0 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0238 Tw (Ed.D. in pedagogy, Montclair State University; ) Tj 230.28 0 TD 0.002 Tc 0 Tw (D.Min.) Tj -360.48 -12.96 TD -0.0053 Tc 0.0225 Tw (in metro-urban ministry, New Brunswick Theological Seminary; ) Tj 313.8 0 TD 0.014 Tc -0.014 Tw (M.S. in) Tj -313.8 -13.08 TD -0.009 Tc 0.049 Tw (educational technology and ) Tj 134.88 0 TD 0.0025 Tc -0.0025 Tw (M.B.A., Ramapo College; Master of Business Studies) Tj -134.88 -12.96 TD -0.016 Tc 0.016 Tw (and ) Tj 20.28 0 TD -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (M.A. in instructional technology, Richard Stockton College; ) Tj 293.28 0 TD 0.0086 Tc -0.0086 Tw (Ed.S. in) Tj -313.56 -12.96 TD -0.0103 Tc 0.0503 Tw (counseling services and ) Tj 116.88 0 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (Ed.S. in school psychology, Rider University; ) Tj 223.68 0 TD -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (Ed.D. in) Tj -340.56 -13.08 TD -0.005 Tc 0.029 Tw (educational leadership, Rowan University; and ) Tj 227.88 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (B.S. in Electrical Engineering) Tj -227.88 -12.84 TD -0.0093 Tc 0.0493 Tw (Technology at DeVry Institute\)) Tj -18 -23.4 TD -0.0051 Tc 0.0051 Tw (Branch campuses) Tj ET 86.4 331.56 84.12 0.6 re f BT 86.4 318.72 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0066 Tc 0.0366 Tw (Two branch campuses were approved) Tj 0 -13.44 TD -0.0089 Tc 0.0569 Tw (\(Burlington County College and ӣƵ Institute of Technology Mt. Laurel) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.002 Tc 0.014 Tw (campus; University of Medicine and Dentistry of ӣƵ-School of Health) Tj T* -0.0032 Tc 0.0032 Tw (Related Professions facility at Scotch Plains\)) Tj -36 -23.64 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0165 Tc 0.1365 Tw (Academic Programs) Tj 18 -13.2 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (From FY 1994 through December 31, 1998, 279 new programs were implemented,) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (most following Presidents\222 Council review. Fifty-seven of the new programs were) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.003 Tc 0.0164 Tw (implemented by exempt institutions. Ten programs required Commission action) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (because they exceeded the institutions\222 programmatic mission.) Tj -18 -23.16 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (From FY 94 to FY 98, institutions reported discontinuance of 288 programs, 48 as) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.012 Tc 0.012 Tw (a result of ) Tj 50.88 0 TD 0.001 Tc -0.001 Tw (Upsala College\222s closure.) Tj -86.88 -23.64 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0047 Tc -0.0047 Tw (Transfer and Articulation) Tj 18 -13.32 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0057 Tc 0.0297 Tw (The Presidents\222 Council proposed an automated system for tracking and reporting) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0.002 Tc 0.002 Tw (articulation agreements between institutions. A standing committee will trouble-) Tj T* -0.0059 Tc 0.0299 Tw (shoot articulations. Improved transfer and articulation will conserve time and) Tj T* 0.0015 Tc -0.0015 Tw (resources of both students and institutions.) Tj ET endstream endobj 63 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 64 0 obj<>stream BT 86.4 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (5) Tj 344.76 0 TD 0.0193 Tc 0.0107 Tw (Appendix Three) Tj -384.72 658.92 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0017 Tc 0 Tw (Accountability) Tj 18 -14.52 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0024 Tc 0.0144 Tw (The Commission establishes the form and content of annual institutional reports) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0028 Tc 0.0148 Tw (and provides data for the institutions\222 use in preparing their reports.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0017 Tc 0.0017 Tw (The Commission issues annual systemwide reports that include updates on key) Tj 0 -13.68 TD 0.0033 Tc -0.0033 Tw (institutional data.) Tj -18 -25.56 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (The performance of public colleges and universities in meeting state priorities for) Tj 0 -12.96 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (graduation, transfer/articulation, efficiency, and diversified revenues will) Tj T* -0.0079 Tc 0.025 Tw (determine part of their FY 2000 state aid.) Tj -36 -23.64 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0036 Tc 0 Tw (Advocacy/Information) Tj 18 -14.52 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (Annual institutional and statewide accountability reports are issued.) Tj -18 -20.64 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0021 Tc 0.0021 Tw (Commission staff and institutional representatives provide information to the) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.009 Tc 0 Tw (Legislature.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0025 Tc 0.0025 Tw (Information resources include Commission and Presidents\222 Council Web pages,) Tj 0 -13.68 TD 0.0011 Tc -0.0011 Tw (quarterly Commission newsletter, and Commission and institutional op eds.) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0033 Tc 0.0033 Tw (The Presidents\222 Council Committee on Advancement, Excellence, and) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (Accountability Reporting organizes conferences and produces brochures.) Tj -36 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (Adoption of regulations pursuant to statute) Tj 18 -14.52 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0055 Tc 0.0295 Tw (The Commission reviewed all existing regulations within the first year after) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.003 Tc 0.023 Tw (restructuring; those not amended or readopted expired.) Tj -18 -20.88 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0038 Tc 0.0188 Tw (The Commission amended existing regulations for community college personnel) Tj 0 -13.68 TD -0.0037 Tc 0.0337 Tw (\(substantive changes\), Equipment Leasing Fund and Higher Education Facilities) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0044 Tc 0.0194 Tw (Trust Fund \(technical amendments\), and state college personnel \(technical) Tj T* -0.0144 Tc 0.1144 Tw (amendments, effective for one year after restructuring\)) Tj -18 -20.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 9.144 Tw ( ) Tj 12.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0036 Tc 0.0186 Tw (The Commission promulgated new regulations for community college ) Tj 340.56 0 TD -0.0033 Tc 0 Tw (chargeback,) Tj -340.56 -13.68 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.015 Tw (licensure, model code of ethics for institutions, residency for tuition purposes, and) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (infrastructure fund; pending Commission takeover of Minority Academic Careers) Tj T* -0.0055 Tc 0.0273 Tw (program, new rules will be promulgated jointly with the Student Assistance Board.) Tj -36 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0039 Tc -0.0148 Tw (The Commission reviews and approves institutional requests for use of bond fund) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0 Tc 0.0128 Tw (allocations \(Higher Education Facilities Trust Fund, Equipment Leasing Fund, Jobs) Tj T* -0.0017 Tc 0.0188 Tw (Education, and Competitiveness Fund, Higher Education Technology Infrastructure) Tj 0 -14.16 TD -0.004 Tc 0 Tw (Fund\).) Tj 0 -23.76 TD 0.002 Tc -0.002 Tw (The Commission and Presidents\222 Council assist in developing capital initiatives,) Tj 0 -14.04 TD 0.0038 Tc -0.0256 Tw (including the current proposal for $550 million in bond funds for four-year) Tj 0 -14.16 TD 0.0102 Tc 0 Tw (institutions.) Tj ET endstream endobj 65 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 66 0 obj<>stream BT 86.4 50.04 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (6) Tj 344.76 0 TD 0.0193 Tc 0.0107 Tw (Appendix Three) Tj -384.72 658.92 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0008 Tc 0.0008 Tw (The Commission undertook a comprehensive assessment of the three grant) Tj 0 -13.8 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (programs it administers and implemented all of the following recommendations for) Tj T* -0.0069 Tc 0.0069 Tw (program improvement:) Tj 18 -19.56 TD -0.012 Tc 0.052 Tw (Special Needs Grant Program) Tj 153.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0 Tc 0.015 Tw ( \226 assessment report adopted in June 1996. Actions) Tj -153.48 -13.8 TD -0.003 Tc 0 Tw (include:) Tj 4.56 -14.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 4.584 Tw ( ) Tj 7.92 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0048 Tc 0.0182 Tw (a new formula for allocating funds among the regional centers) Tj -13.44 -14.64 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 4.584 Tw ( ) Tj 7.92 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0067 Tc 0.0067 Tw (consolidation of two centers) Tj -13.44 -14.64 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 4.584 Tw ( ) Tj 7.92 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.003 Tc 0.013 Tw (a new center at a public four-year institution \(to serve learning disabled students\)) Tj -13.68 -13.44 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 4.824 Tw ( ) Tj 8.16 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0039 Tc 0.0159 Tw (a permanent committee to advise on program needs and related issues.) Tj -18 -19.32 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.007 Tc 0.007 Tw (College Bound Grant Program) Tj 158.16 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0031 Tc 0.0231 Tw ( \(transferred from Department of Education\) \226) Tj -158.16 -13.8 TD -0.0037 Tc 0.017 Tw (assessment report adopted in September 1997. Comprehensive assessment was the) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0028 Tc 0.0028 Tw (first since program\222s 1986 inception. Actions include:) Tj 3 -14.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 6.144 Tw ( ) Tj 9.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0055 Tc 0.0295 Tw (advisory group for the program established) Tj -15 -14.64 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 6.144 Tw ( ) Tj 9.48 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (new, open-competition Request for Proposal issues) Tj -15.12 -14.64 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 6.264 Tw ( ) Tj 9.6 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0048 Tc 0.0314 Tw (data collection system developed to enable future evaluation and improvement.) Tj -15.12 -19.68 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0038 Tc 0.0238 Tw (Education of Language Minority Students Grant Program) Tj 299.28 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0014 Tc 0.0014 Tw ( \226 assessment report) Tj -299.28 -13.8 TD -0.006 Tc 0.026 Tw (adopted in October 1997. Actions include:) Tj 3 -14.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 3.264 Tw ( ) Tj 6.6 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (better application/proposal review processes) Tj -12.12 -14.76 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 3.264 Tw ( ) Tj 6.6 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0056 Tc 0.0189 Tw (a student tracking system for improved program evaluation and accountability) Tj -12.12 -13.32 TD /F7 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw (\267) Tj 5.52 0 TD /F6 12 Tf 3.264 Tw ( ) Tj 6.6 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0053 Tc 0.0253 Tw (a redefined role for the Council for the Education of Language Minority Students) Tj 5.88 -12.96 TD -0.0048 Tc 0.0048 Tw (as an advisory resource) Tj -41.88 -23.64 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0031 Tc -0.0031 Tw (Examples of other coordination, cooperation and collaboration) Tj 18 -13.2 TD 0 Tc -0 Tw (The Business-Higher Education Seminar) Tj 209.04 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0085 Tc 0.0285 Tw ( convened to discuss how colleges and) Tj -209.04 -12.96 TD -0.0036 Tc 0.0136 Tw (universities and the corporate sector could work together for mutual benefit. The) Tj 0 -13.08 TD -0.003 Tc 0.018 Tw (Commission provided information for Prosperity ӣƵ\222s Business Resource) Tj 0 -12.84 TD -0.0103 Tc 0 Tw (Center.) Tj 0 -23.16 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0055 Tc 0.0055 Tw (Joint campus ) Tj 71.28 0 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.006 Tc 0.042 Tw (of Burlington County College and NJIT in Mt. Laurel expands access) Tj -71.28 -12.84 TD -0.0056 Tc 0.0296 Tw (to engineering/technology offerings in South Jersey.) Tj 0 -23.16 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0028 Tc 0.0028 Tw (Twenty-eight joint or cooperative programs) Tj 224.52 0 TD /F4 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw ( approved, primarily in science, health,) Tj -224.52 -12.84 TD -0.0038 Tc 0.0158 Tw (or technological fields, which are more costly than liberal arts programs.) Tj ET endstream endobj 67 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 68 0 obj<>stream BT 93.6 38.52 TD 0 0 0 rg /F4 9.96 Tf 0.0086 Tc 0.0214 Tw (Appendix Four) Tj 405 0 TD 0.0194 Tc 0.0106 Tw (Page ) Tj 21.96 0 TD 0.06 Tc 0 Tw (1) Tj -238.32 668.52 TD /F3 14.04 Tf -0.0021 Tc -0.0279 Tw (Appendix 4) Tj -58.32 -16.08 TD -0.0102 Tc -0.0198 Tw (College and University Profiles) Tj -130.32 -20.16 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.005 Tc 0 Tw (Introduction) Tj 0 -19.56 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0015 Tc 0.0015 Tw (The Higher Education Restructuring Act requires the 1999 comprehensive assessment of) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.0133 Tw (restructuring to include a summary of key data for each public institution of higher) Tj T* -0.0016 Tc 0.0016 Tw (education. The specific data elements are prescribed by statute. Most of the required data) Tj T* -0.0069 Tc 0.0369 Tw (are routinely compiled by the Commission on Higher Education through the IPEDS and) Tj T* -0.0012 Tc 0.0012 Tw (SURE systems. Commission staff collected additional required information from the) Tj T* -0.0009 Tc 0.0009 Tw (individual institutions to complete the profiles that follow.) Tj 0 -20.04 TD /F3 12 Tf 0 Tc -0 Tw (Accreditation Status) Tj 0 -19.56 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.001 Tc 0.001 Tw (All ӣƵ public institutions are regionally accredited by the Middle States) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (Association of Colleges and Schools. Therefore, this information is not included in each) Tj T* 0.0029 Tc -0.0029 Tw (institution\222s profile.) Tj 0 -25.56 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.0045 Tc -0.0045 Tw (Senior Public Institutions) Tj 0 -19.56 TD /F4 12 Tf -0.0018 Tc 0.0018 Tw (Profile of all students) Tj 102.96 0 TD -0.0049 Tc 0.0169 Tw (. For every institution except Thomas Edison State College, these) Tj ET 93.6 468 102.84 0.6 re f BT 93.6 456.12 TD -0.0037 Tc 0.0117 Tw (numbers refer to fall 1998 enrollment. In the case of Edison, the numbers include all) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0059 Tc 0.0192 Tw (students who enrolled at any time during Fiscal Year 1998.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0031 Tc 0.0031 Tw (Undergraduate student profile) Tj 143.88 0 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (. For every institution except the University of Medicine &) Tj ET 93.6 412.8 143.76 0.6 re f BT 93.6 400.92 TD -0 Tc 0.0092 Tw (Dentistry of ӣƵ, this table includes only undergraduates. In the case of UMDNJ,) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.003 Tc 0.018 Tw (the numbers include all students, graduate/first-professional and undergraduate, because) Tj T* -0.0035 Tc 0.0235 Tw (UMDNJ is the only public institution that has more graduate and first-professional students) Tj T* -0.0069 Tc 0.0069 Tw (than undergraduates.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0107 Tc 0.0107 Tw (SAT scores) Tj 55.56 0 TD 0.0014 Tc -0.0014 Tw (. SAT scores are reported in the profiles for all senior public institutions except) Tj ET 93.6 330 55.44 0.6 re f BT 93.6 318.12 TD -0.0064 Tc 0.034 Tw (for Thomas Edison State College and the University of Medicine & Dentistry of New) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0084 Tc 0.0427 Tw (Jersey. The reason for the exceptions is that all of Edison's entering undergraduates are) Tj T* -0.009 Tc 0.029 Tw (transfers, as are the majority of ) Tj 152.16 0 TD -0 Tc 0 Tw (UMDNJ's students. The Commission generally receives) Tj -152.16 -13.8 TD -0.0041 Tc 0.0281 Tw (SAT scores only for first-time students.) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0154 Tc 0.0154 Tw (Profile of full-time faculty) Tj 126.6 0 TD 0.0016 Tc 0.0104 Tw (. This indicator is omitted for Thomas Edison State College,) Tj ET 93.6 247.2 126.48 0.6 re f BT 93.6 235.32 TD -0.0056 Tc 0.0189 Tw (which has no faculty of its own. The table for UMDNJ omits faculty who are paid by other) Tj 0 -13.8 TD 0.0018 Tc -0.0318 Tw (institutions, such as Cooper Hospital.) Tj 0 -27.84 TD /F3 12 Tf -0.0042 Tc 0.0042 Tw (Community Colleges) Tj 0 -19.56 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.0075 Tc 0 Tw (Students) Tj 41.4 0 TD -0.0056 Tc 0.0256 Tw (. In the two student profile tables, non-degree-seeking students are included, while) Tj ET 93.6 172.2 41.28 0.6 re f BT 93.6 160.32 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.0106 Tw (non-credit students are excluded. \(Both of these statements are true for the senior publics as) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.006 Tc 0.021 Tw (well, but the relative numbers involved are much smaller.\)) Tj 0 -27.6 TD -0.0011 Tc 0 Tw (Remediation) Tj 61.32 0 TD -0.0054 Tc 0.0225 Tw (. Institutional policies differ with regard to who needs to be tested and/or when,) Tj ET 93.6 117 61.2 0.6 re f BT 93.6 105.12 TD -0.0046 Tc 0.023 Tw (the testing instrument\(s\) used, and the cut-score\(s\) that are viewed as determining need for) Tj 0 -13.8 TD -0.0022 Tc 0.0022 Tw (remediation. Therefore the profile data on remediation are not comparable across) Tj T* -0.0019 Tc 0.0019 Tw (institutions and should not be aggregated.) Tj ET endstream endobj 69 0 obj<>/ProcSet 103 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 70 0 obj<>stream BT 191.28 245.76 TD 0 0 0 rg /F10 12 Tf 0.0037 Tc -0.0037 Tw (ӣƵ Commission on Higher Education) Tj 77.4 -16.68 TD 0.0144 Tc -0.0504 Tw (P.O. Box 542) Tj -13.68 -16.8 TD 0.0016 Tc 0.0224 Tw (Trenton, NJ 08625) Tj 10.08 -16.8 TD 0.0102 Tc 0.0138 Tw (\(609\) 292-4310) Tj -102.6 -33.48 TD 0.0034 Tc -0.0034 Tw (Offices located at 20 West State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608) Tj 63.84 -16.8 TD 0.0103 Tc 0.0137 Tw (E-mail: ) Tj 35.64 0 TD 0.0027 Tc 0 Tw (nj_che@che.state.nj.us) Tj -56.16 -13.8 TD 0.0103 Tc 0.0137 Tw (Web site) Tj 40.56 0 TD -0.036 Tc 0.06 Tw (: ) Tj 6 0 TD 0.0083 Tc 0 Tw (www.state.nj/) Tj 63 0 TD -0.0072 Tc (highereducation) Tj ET 252.36 128.88 139.32 1.2 re f endstream endobj 71 0 obj 32642 endobj 72 0 obj 32642 endobj 73 0 obj 0 endobj 74 0 obj 0 endobj 75 0 obj<>stream  POS/2rm}Vcmap[?2cvt nfpgm  fglyfca[16head%C6hheaA oC$hmtxkC >locaRN)$maxppSM name;Sm post.]prepLVpw+W#3#3o f  MONO! Q |   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?ٷұѱʲϸ鳧ձհ³ݳ۴ܰڰհ帿ڲԴDZٳܱɳā荎<~~ O\_   " & 0 3 : < > D  !!!!"!&!.!^!!"""""""")"+"H"a"e###!%%% %%%%%$%,%4%<%l%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%&<&@&B&`&c&f&k ~Q^   & 0 2 9 < > D  !!!!"!&!.![!!"""""""")"+"H"`"d### %%% %%%%%$%,%4%<%P%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%&:&@&B&`&c&e&ji+*)(][w}ujyߨߖޖޢދަq_0@3$FE<9630)"ۿ۾۷ۥۯEBA$"!tt|bcdefghjikmlnoqprsutvwxzy{}|~      !"#$%&'()*+,  -   ./0 !"12#3$%&'()*+4?Avw|&kl   RfH /E 0 F)G6_TI[bptv&1Vak1_iy !DEc3 (I >k<]O[ 09J]j O\)>6!0199<JSeilvz| )6}W-5\+./JNORSTUYefnoyy~ -<FWc  ";6&)9w- I| !#.=?JQRghtuuzz+-224EUX !"4OQUWbcgm".4bg~ (RV{ <)#f!d~8}_S R+#E'L!fp{gC'E]_4k-}:FROen=SZV*8lSi41sJh?  9; R@??>=<:9878743210/.-,+*)('&%$#"!  ,E#F` &`&#HH-,E#F#a &a&#HH-,E#F` a F`&#HH-,E#F#a ` &a a&#HH-,E#F`@a f`&#HH-,E#F#a@` &a@a&#HH-, <<-, E# D# ZQX# D#Y QX# MD#Y &QX# D#Y!!-, EhD ` EFvhE`D-, C#Ce -, C#C -,F#pF>F#pFE: -,EJ#DEI#D-, E%EadPQXED!!Y-,Cc#b#B+-, EC`D-,CCe -, i@a ,b`+ d#da\XaY-,E+G#DGz-,TX CTXJIDDYY-,CXE+G#DGzEi G#D QX+G#DGz!GzYY-,-,KRX!ED#E %ERXD!!YY-,/-, %EI#DEJ#DEe#E %`j #B#hj`a Ry!J@JE TX#!?#YaDRyI@ IE TX#!?#YaD-,C#C -,C#C -, C#C -, C#Ce -,C#Ce -,C#Ce -,KRXED!!Y-, %#I@` c RX#%8#%e8c8!!!!!Y-,Ei C`:-,%# `#-,%# a#-,%-, ` <<-, a <<-,++**-,CC -,>**-,5-,vK#p KE PXaY:/-,!! d#d@b-,!QX d#d b@/+Y`-,!QX d#dUb/+Y`-, d#d@b`#!-,&&&&Eh:-,&&&&Ehe:-,E# E %PX&a&`YD-,F#F`F# F`ab# #KKpE` PXa@Yh:-,3+**-,CXY-,CXY-,CXY-,CXY-,KS#KQZX8!!Y-,KS#KQZX E`D!!Y-, +# <+-,%8(+# #+CX7#w'"t:BmɢRWA9@k32/9910!!q/7Jb@ l ֲ32?99103#z09@` $>??99.+}103ISl O@1uy wei g ' jjPp`!q]??10]]]7632#"&7327654&#"l|^v|]x?1>3Cc@1;0L5*mSmQv`E] naDkY @)9JYi@(  @ P`O ++z/rq]+z/+<93?<+?<9/9.+}10rq]$73#,1HJ=9`fY  -@0 P @ P ` p    0@Pj O@ jPp`q]]9/]33rq]?<32!!676767654&#"ΖI67-&V:՛+8I5{*ִbVdF^NNYV*@8f "ff v  )! 0 @ P   @  @&( !$  j$jPp@ 0@Pj^@j OI++Nq]Mq]]]9/]93??]rq9/q]910q]]]732654&#"72654&#"'67632#"&VJ=MlXF)\dD4o,,Slq]GNk!uZi_eqhIP4Ytϯv).^. @E        (         d@   K@"      0 O   ++z/q]+9/+<392??<<<99.+}ć.+}9+993/3.10^]^]]]!733##')ʝ*4^N+e7k @!3C (R #@P 0@ p-@((j '@0P!]rq]3/9/339+?<+32#"&kL9TN=/W(·]-q7"E"sge­hf45¨ܑ&@$6DTv ### # #@/?j/  j   @jy'rq]rq]3/]3??9/9/3910]].#"632#".532327654&#"7.Gk#LUc]*ރK8E1BJ5*W;TXE=uumOismIo%1 @///0///) ##@% ,,j@p/ ?  j  /  j/?W@ &j@PP2q]rq]]]99??9/r]9910.54>32#"&54632654&#"32654&#"i?@giefJIf~̚ljG5=bG6?_iL:VgN9Is'3Rmdão57e޸$GSrQIVqU[|M\k&@+;KYjz # ## # #@ j@%  j 0@Pj  0 ` O `  'qr]]]]2??9/9/3910]73267#"&5432#"&4&#"32>7/Ұ#ѰՉ꼲]ބ鰭825+;·<Xs`UtmOirmJv&U@ Wl l(A =3323+??999910q3#3#,/V0&2Q_>M@A ""%:H#G$%&&n$$4e Je  %$$+Be ӹ.հ8/=۳??")6.FthF\c -hej(b?3G'(kCOZ@/YYhJHH:88  ( 5g`wp+@v  0@v u :@ uI+N]M]]^]^?]q?10]^]^]]]]#"$32.#"326Kr[]yd_-<<nŽE @  WZ 0@` @`0@ Z( Z \i&:KZix   0P0@ P`pI _+++zN/r]+zM/r]q]+3329]q?<<+?<<9/]qr<<.+}<<103!!!!!E{*}9n*E)rH @U  W  WZ(P (  o / ? _  @ P`pp +++z/r]+z/q]+<<?<<<+?<<<9/]r+<<.+}ć.+}<<<<10!#3!3#/qbaq6F1@ֳr\RHu^? LЖIfZE@^V g W Z0@Z(':KYi 3Zu@ `p ++z/]+z/]+<9q]?<+?<<9/]<<.+}<<10]!#!2+732>54'&+<鈒Ykm;*LV>$Nyv 2X_$go*@&+"e kv  !" E{ !!t@.   '    !@P@ v+@;v' !u$$$$$$/O@ 0@P +]qq]9/q]9/q]9??]rq]9rq].+}10]q]732654'&'.54632&#"#".j,fXrs!!s? c],+r=עSv\5dQ9)(I]g` SHB)*F[e]@W_oWZ%HXfx ix r@ 0`p ++z/q]+z/q]+<39rq]?#0@ F( /$ U,@;$M$$$/$$,"f ,^ 1($3p?_e@ t){11 +<+rq]9/+z/q]+<+??32#&'#"&5476767654&#"32>7)ʛ *#4CjRQ9A8z#i=/1Z6.hLEQ:>󴳨W=$0;}϶57<@V1FV65IYU( f^  tO _  o  z@' -o  9  ++z/^]^rq]+z/q]+<?32#"'32>54&#"{@X ) 9 I i ^ J@ p 1@^ /?t}@t 0``rq]9/]?^]^]?^]^10]]#"&54632&#"3269ߏȇ烔 |9nSM69i-1^_eadc@]XiI Y Xw;IIv U( ^ ^ &3Qfw ?|@ t``+rq+z/q]+<?54&#"hB}JX^_D8jOfB3jOsM>%t~Wux[a>@(Y'7I 0@@@`pOJ@0`p0@P  @P`p@'f f/sP?z@t``rqrq]]9/9??]rq^]^]]]]9/q]<]qqr<10]]!327#"5432'74&#"dFtC>΀YGHuk+ ui]ytZ@oV    U  ^     py[ y"0EUf>+r+<332?32&#"$뒃$;nLmx-U5" &Tmo=0#\K4Q>!0@5`2X/i+H/[X,' 550J )*+U@J@ 0 Y@-f- &^ -f1($4P`t =|@  !!1"t`11 +<+r9/9+z/q]+<+???#"&5463273#"'&532>54&#"6?@?O,yzeU* ݗ-"/Sh3'B6kNeA2aR8,@>1b2|1mgbuEV-yH7ZyvUF@O2 FB R wr  UU  f^O}x@$!0@Qgw 8++rq]rq]+<<?32#654&#"1ZՊJ8-;5$!P>~?ⲵ7>15+@@<( (e"[d2AP`p{+rq]+<?<+?)D@ 11 HAA WP a q /+P+p+' +"'( UU((U)))f "f(() o+++)(W~@ (W~@$ ()W)n)~)))))))) ))c)))) * )++++z/rq]+z/rq]+z/q]+<<<]?<<<<<+?<?<.+}ć.+}ć.+}99999..10]]]]3632>32#654&#"#654&#"#/Wfxoo.(UD6$Rn1&3m T&Riu7wz.1jSo -4a]7F>@P4DDTRr U  Uf(    ^  O }  x@$!0@Qgw 8 ++rq]rq]+<<?<<<+?<?.+}ć.+}9.10]3>32#654&#"#WMi~gh7,02HF#K&[G7Z9=&6Lf> I@"^^ t?@`w@ tO`rqrq]??107632#"&4&#"3276fv޵cL@pTgL`C]ixXuwf6>i@5*GU  ()  ++z/q]+<3/9+?<?&@f&v&&&   J@EJ Z   H [  2 @ P ` p  ?//?YfJ@  @$f% "  t`"p""O_@?o [@t_o']rqrq]]]]9999?^]^]?rq]]9rq].+}10q]732654'&'&'&5463 &#"# %\LIZL3QԸ82&DFv:Uڴ),ZGF/ U1O.~8+$*<9Sw~@i$4 U 0     U^  2W _yz/rq]99?9?<<<<<xwIQժCx#"pl2v&@_DDDUUV666ff  U  Uf   ( EW[ax@( 0@EPu  @   +<+++z/rq]+z/q]+<<+?<<<?73#7#"&547l9)0/BNVj}&q0@"/ڐ6y& 8@x  9  PP    9 I    U   m@  k@-   N _    e@;D 9l ^]^q]r]q9/q]3/9999999?<<<!<W/@i(  @?:S:  $  : :O  :  [ :y ( :  :/"i:::1k::  :/ i :Typeface The Monotype Corporation plc. Data The Monotype Corporation plc / Type Solutions Inc. 1990-91 All Rights Reserved.AIOJDI+ArialNarrowBold ItalicAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicVersion 2.20AIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicArial is a registered trademark of The Monotype Corporation plc.fed kursivAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicFett KursivAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicTypeface The Monotype Corporation plc. Data The Monotype Corporation plc / Type Solutions Inc. 1990-91 All Rights Reserved.AIOJDI+ArialNarrowBold ItalicAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicVersion 2.20AIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicArial is a registered trademark of The Monotype Corporation plc.Negrita CursivaAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicLihavoitu KursivoituAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicGras ItaliqueAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicGrassetto CorsivoAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicVet CursiefAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicHalvfet KursivAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicFet KursivAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicNegrito ItlicoAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicNegrita CursivaAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicGras ItaliqueAIOJDI+ArialNarrow,BoldItalicL'      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~      !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~.nullnonmarkingreturnspaceexclamquotedbl numbersigndollarpercent ampersand quotesingle parenleft parenrightasteriskpluscommahyphenperiodslashzeroonetwothreefourfivesixseveneightninecolon semicolonlessequalgreaterquestionatABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ bracketleft backslash bracketright asciicircum underscoregraveabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz braceleftbar braceright asciitilde AdieresisAringCcedillaEacuteNtilde Odieresis Udieresisaacuteagrave acircumflex adieresisatildearingccedillaeacuteegrave ecircumflex edieresisiacuteigrave icircumflex idieresisntildeoacuteograve ocircumflex odieresisotildeuacuteugrave ucircumflex udieresisdaggerdegreecentsterlingsectionbullet paragraph germandbls registered copyright trademarkacutedieresisnotequalAEOslashinfinity plusminus lessequal greaterequalyenmu1 partialdiff summationproductpi1integral ordfeminine ordmasculineOhmaeoslash questiondown exclamdown logicalnotradicalflorin approxequal increment guillemotleftguillemotrightellipsisAgraveAtildeOtildeOEoeendashemdash quotedblleft quotedblright quoteleft quoterightdividelozenge ydieresis Ydieresisfractioncurrency guilsinglleftguilsinglrightfifl daggerdblperiodcenteredquotesinglbase quotedblbase perthousand Acircumflex EcircumflexAacute EdieresisEgraveIacute Icircumflex IdieresisIgraveOacute OcircumflexOgraveUacute UcircumflexUgravedotlessi circumflextildemacronbreve dotaccentringcedilla hungarumlautogonekcaronLslashlslashScaronscaronZcaronzcaron brokenbarEthethYacuteyacuteThornthornminusmultiply onesuperior twosuperior threesuperioronehalf onequarter threequartersfrancGbrevegbreveIdotScedillascedillaCacutecacuteCcaronccarondmacron overscoremiddotAbreveabreveAogonekaogonekDcarondcaronDslashEogonekeogonekEcaronecaronLacutelacuteLcaronlcaronLdotldotNacutenacuteNcaronncaron Odblacute odblacuteRacuteracuteRcaronrcaronSacutesacuteTcedillatcedillaTcarontcaronUringuring Udblacute udblacuteZacutezacuteZdotzdotGammaThetaPhialphadeltaepsilonsigmatauphi underscoredbl exclamdbl nsuperiorpeseta arrowleftarrowup arrowright arrowdown arrowboth arrowupdn arrowupdnbse orthogonal intersection equivalencehouse revlogicalnot integraltp integralbtSF100000SF110000SF010000SF030000SF020000SF040000SF080000SF090000SF060000SF070000SF050000SF430000SF240000SF510000SF520000SF390000SF220000SF210000SF250000SF500000SF490000SF380000SF280000SF270000SF260000SF360000SF370000SF420000SF190000SF200000SF230000SF470000SF480000SF410000SF450000SF460000SF400000SF540000SF530000SF440000upblockdnblockblocklfblockrtblockltshadeshadedkshade filledbox filledrecttriaguptriagrttriagdntriaglfcircle invbullet invcircle smileface invsmilefacesunfemalemalespadeclubheartdiamond musicalnotemusicalnotedblIJij napostropheminutesecond afii61248 afii61289H22073H18543H18551H18533 openbulletAmacronamacron Ccircumflex ccircumflexCdotcdotEmacronemacronEbreveebreveEdotedot Gcircumflex gcircumflexGdotgdotGcedillagcedilla Hcircumflex hcircumflexHbarhbarItildeitildeImacronimacronIbreveibreveIogonekiogonek Jcircumflex jcircumflexKcedillakcedilla kgreenlandicLcedillalcedillaNcedillancedillaEngengOmacronomacronObreveobreveRcedillarcedilla Scircumflex scircumflexTbartbarUtildeutildeUmacronumacronUbreveubreveUogonekuogonek Wcircumflex wcircumflex Ycircumflex ycircumflexlongs Aringacute aringacuteAEacuteaeacute Oslashacute oslashacute anoteleiaWgravewgraveWacutewacute Wdieresis wdieresisYgraveygrave quotereversed radicalex afii08941 estimated oneeighth threeeighths fiveeighths seveneighths commaaccentundercommaaccenttonos dieresistonos Alphatonos EpsilontonosEtatonos Iotatonos Omicrontonos Upsilontonos OmegatonosiotadieresistonosAlphaBetaDeltaEpsilonZetaEtaIotaKappaLambdaMuNuXiOmicronPiRhoSigmaTauUpsilonChiPsiOhm IotadieresisUpsilondieresis alphatonos epsilontonosetatonos iotatonosupsilondieresistonosbetagammazetaetathetaiotakappalambdamunuxiomicronrhosigma1upsilonchipsiomega iotadieresisupsilondieresis omicrontonos upsilontonos omegatonos afii10023 afii10051 afii10052 afii10053 afii10054 afii10055 afii10056 afii10057 afii10058 afii10059 afii10060 afii10061 afii10062 afii10145 afii10017 afii10018 afii10019 afii10020 afii10021 afii10022 afii10024 afii10025 afii10026 afii10027 afii10028 afii10029 afii10030 afii10031 afii10032 afii10033 afii10034 afii10035 afii10036 afii10037 afii10038 afii10039 afii10040 afii10041 afii10042 afii10043 afii10044 afii10045 afii10046 afii10047 afii10048 afii10049 afii10065 afii10066 afii10067 afii10068 afii10069 afii10070 afii10072 afii10073 afii10074 afii10075 afii10076 afii10077 afii10078 afii10079 afii10080 afii10081 afii10082 afii10083 afii10084 afii10085 afii10086 afii10087 afii10088 afii10089 afii10090 afii10091 afii10092 afii10093 afii10094 afii10095 afii10096 afii10097 afii10071 afii10099 afii10100 afii10101 afii10102 afii10103 afii10104 afii10105 afii10106 afii10107 afii10108 afii10109 afii10110 afii10193 afii10050 afii10098 afii00208 afii61352pi foursuperior fivesuperior sevensuperior eightsuperiorhh@ ff^^ A 0@P`p@%vvvKK;;@ /?9  0 9  /?O_o9  0 @ P ` 9 OO   o?@o?@ o?@o?@  A 0@Y@Yd77@7P7p7707`7777%%@27cz+cz+xx9xx9 FF@ ֲu"Բu%AW'{4j Jj)³j#jA ku juMdj#cj1u/u!A (M'jp j%4j%54j@ %ju'%4juj-@ +j$u+@ jjj@ uu(j8sj@ pjoj`njB.gu`j[YjVjӲv0AZ'4^ ^ ^Mf fznvAiZ'4hZ gbfR60v-v,v*Z&^A #^ f.f-f^@ `f"ZeZz^ v Z f@"^^Ylv6kvzef(FFFU  A w.@;X$"   ) 9 H  KKSBsKcKb S# QZ#BKKTB8+KR7+K P[XYTXCX)YY+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++KPy+KSy+KSXY2KSXYKS \X" ED! EDYX"ERX"DYYKMS \Xj"ED""EDYX qjERXj qDYYKS \XU"EDt"EDYXUERXUDYYKS \XW!EDu!EDYXWERXWDYYKS \XtEDttEDYXERXDYYK$S \X^^EDv^EDYX^ERX^DYYK-S \X^^EDZ^EDYX(^ERX^(DYYKzS \X^^EDf^EDYX-^ERX^-DYYpKSXF!FEDYKSXFaFEDYuWFEh#E`DpKSXF!FEDYKSXFaFEDYtUFEh#E`DpKSXF!FEDYKSXFaFEDYjFEh#E`D+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++eBEiSBKPXBYC\XBY CX`!YBp>CX ? +Y #B #B??+</ #B#BCX;!~ +Y #B #BCX-A-A +Y#B#BCX~;! +Y#B#B++++++++++Eh*Eh@` #DEh+Eh@`"#DEh-Eh@`,#Dst++s^s^ssssss^s^sssssst^s^ssssu^s^u^s^u^s^u^s^++stttststststststsKdR#B endstream endobj 76 0 obj<> endobj 77 0 obj<> endobj 78 0 obj<> endobj 79 0 obj<> endobj 80 0 obj<> endobj 81 0 obj<> endobj 82 0 obj<> endobj 83 0 obj<> endobj 84 0 obj<> endobj 85 0 obj<> endobj 86 0 obj<> endobj 87 0 obj<> endobj 88 0 obj<> endobj 89 0 obj<> endobj 90 0 obj<> endobj 91 0 obj<> endobj 92 0 obj<> endobj 93 0 obj[/CalRGB<>] endobj 94 0 obj[/CalGray<>] endobj 95 0 obj<>stream Wednesday, July 07, 1999 11:37:33 AM Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows application/pdf Unknown res99.pdf Microsoft Word 2007-10-11T10:29:10-04:00 2007-10-11T10:29:10-04:00 uuid:f07a4af3-286b-4a05-89da-4a31c207f0a5 uuid:481d279a-fa52-45a0-8f30-0a8ba955334f endstream endobj 96 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 97 0000000000 65535 f 0000002476 00000 n 0000002655 00000 n 0000007879 00000 n 0000007900 00000 n 0000007921 00000 n 0000007938 00000 n 0000007955 00000 n 0000029369 00000 n 0000029643 00000 n 0000029823 00000 n 0000035223 00000 n 0000035414 00000 n 0000045634 00000 n 0000045815 00000 n 0000054121 00000 n 0000054302 00000 n 0000059267 00000 n 0000059458 00000 n 0000064938 00000 n 0000065129 00000 n 0000070797 00000 n 0000070998 00000 n 0000080312 00000 n 0000080513 00000 n 0000086219 00000 n 0000086420 00000 n 0000090855 00000 n 0000091036 00000 n 0000096512 00000 n 0000096534 00000 n 0000096556 00000 n 0000096574 00000 n 0000096592 00000 n 0000115878 00000 n 0000116144 00000 n 0000116315 00000 n 0000121552 00000 n 0000121713 00000 n 0000123915 00000 n 0000124086 00000 n 0000129322 00000 n 0000129493 00000 n 0000135588 00000 n 0000135759 00000 n 0000141386 00000 n 0000141567 00000 n 0000146867 00000 n 0000147038 00000 n 0000152085 00000 n 0000152256 00000 n 0000156813 00000 n 0000156974 00000 n 0000159946 00000 n 0000160127 00000 n 0000167411 00000 n 0000167613 00000 n 0000173319 00000 n 0000173521 00000 n 0000179113 00000 n 0000179304 00000 n 0000183942 00000 n 0000184133 00000 n 0000190346 00000 n 0000190537 00000 n 0000195262 00000 n 0000195453 00000 n 0000200072 00000 n 0000200243 00000 n 0000205091 00000 n 0000205253 00000 n 0000206023 00000 n 0000206045 00000 n 0000206067 00000 n 0000206085 00000 n 0000206103 00000 n 0000238842 00000 n 0000239118 00000 n 0000240197 00000 n 0000240305 00000 n 0000240408 00000 n 0000240518 00000 n 0000240613 00000 n 0000240848 00000 n 0000241879 00000 n 0000241993 00000 n 0000243069 00000 n 0000244145 00000 n 0000244226 00000 n 0000244325 00000 n 0000244426 00000 n 0000244527 00000 n 0000244628 00000 n 0000244729 00000 n 0000244875 00000 n 0000244943 00000 n 0000248800 00000 n trailer <> startxref 116 %%EOF