樱花视频

樱花视频 Commission on Higher Education

The Restructuring of 樱花视频
Higher Education

Commission Home Page

An Interim Report to the Governor and 樱花视频 Legislature

The report is based primarily on two surveys. In the first, the Commission and the President's Council, as well as various state agencies given responsibilities for higher education by the Restructuring Act, were asked to indicate whether tasks assigned to them as a result of restructuring have been addressed. Results from that survey indicate that of the 85 assignments, 67 are complete or in various stages of implementation, and 18 are still in the planning stage.

As an example of work completed, the Commission, in consultation with members of the Presidents' Council, submitted recommendations to the Governor and Legislature in four areas designated by the legislation. Specifically, results of studies of funding and tuition establishment, student aid administration, collective bargaining and civil service and recommendations for increased collaboration between higher education and secondary education were completed and advanced. The Commission, with the advice and assistance of the Presidents' Council, is completing a master plan, with adoption expected by October 1996. The Presidents' Council reviewed 73 new degree programs, an ongoing assignment. Public colleges and universities prepared and released institutional accountability reports and will continue to do so on an annual basis.

The second survey asked members of all the major 樱花视频 higher education constituencies, as well as key state policy makers, their opinions about restructuring, both generally and specifically.

• On the general assessment of restructuring, positive views outweighed negative as well as mixed views.

• Opinions have become more positive during the first 20 months under the new structure.

• Respondents' degree of support for restructuring correlates directly with their reported level of knowledge about it; for example, a majority of those who reported knowing a great deal about restructuring believe the change was positive.

• The assessments of specific conditions and responsibilities indicate that a majority of those holding an opinion perceived those areas as being handled as well or better than they were before restructuring.

Receiving especially positive ratings were: institutional flexibility in establishing new academic programs; institutional governing board decision making and accountability; timeliness in addressing issues and making decisions on the part of the Commission, the Presidents' Council, and institutional boards; and cooperation among these entities.

The report makes recommendations in four areas that received less favorable ratings from approximately one-fifth of the respondents:

TRUSTEE APPOINTMENTS: The Commission and Presidents' Council should request the Governor's Office to review the trustee appointment process in an effort to streamline and expedite it.

While affordability is viewed by almost half of the respondents as the same or better under the new structure, it is still an issue of concern because one-third of the respondents believe it is worse. Affordability is an issue in states across the nation regardless of the governance structure. Its relationship to restructuring is unclear. Under any circumstances, this area bears close watching to ensure that statewide goals of affordability and accessibility are met.

Overall, the interim assessment indicates that there has been considerable progress in developing and nurturing New Jersey's new governance structure for higher education. While this assessment identifies areas for improvement, it is too soon to determine whether any major structural changes should be considered. The Commission and Presidents' Council will continue to monitor progress, and will make a more definitive assessment in 1999 as the Restructuring Act requires.

---

Commission Home Page

The Commission | Reports & Documents | News Releases / Newsletters | EOF & Grant Programs
More Information about NJ Higher Ed